search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?

BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"Art is man determined to die sane."

- Bernard de Voto

Notice Board

Femes talent

Looking for a female vocalist/ guitarist

Design + printing service

Professional photo editing available

Indian &malay gals wanted to act along bollywood stars

Urgenttlyyy needed a bass player!!!!!!

Day, night & bridal make-up on www.surayanuar.com updated!

P ramlee the musical ticket

"sessionist services" / wanted urgently !""female pianist cum singer&female singer cum guitarist"

"personal music class "(klang&petaling jaya only)&"2 / 3 /4 piece acoustic band for live shows or events"

You are not logged in.
articles

Alfred Loh as Ken, the moody wannabe dancer.

Amelia Chen assumes New Age Guru position.

Amelia Chen, Fang Chyi, and Alfred Loh make one big happy family.

Fish and Aishah Sinclair face off about the political correctness of animal sex.

Fish as the lecherous Encik Zakaria makes his moves.

Bella Rahim as Yen, sticks to her traditions.

Maybel Chan and Bella Rahim share a memory or two.

The actors move those cumbersome boxes.

 View on a single page

20. 03. 2008
Three Times the Trouble by Yasmin Zetti Martin

TO have your work watched alongside somebody else’s requires guts. It’s hard enough that most audiences will usually spend the majority of a play comparing it to something they remember vaguely from 300 years ago, but now you’re giving audiences the opportunity to compare your work to another’s side-by-side? It’s inevitable that audiences will choose a favorite, and your little play may be cast to the winds and soon forgotten. Talk about performance anxiety.

In some cases, however, that can be a good thing, as is the case in KLPac’s “Triple Bill: Uncut, Untitled, Paper House, featuring three new plays by three young playwrights.

Johann Lim makes his writing and directorial debut, with his contribution of Untitled

The play tells the story of Ken, who wants to dance. Alfred Loh, playing Ken, conveys this desire by sullenly frowning while constantly declaring that he doesn’t want to be a corporate man. Fang Chyi, as his mother, sullenly frowns back at him as they exchange clichéd, repetitive dialogue.

Amelia Chen’s sister character seems to have been inserted only to provide the comic relief, as the character does little to modify, or modulate the way we see Ken, his mother or the conflict at the centre of the play. Her over-enthusiastic new-age guru wannabe type stopped being funny around the same time slipping on banana peels stopped raising even canned laughter, so it fails even on that level.

In fact the whole subject is just tired. The older generation vs. the new has been washed, and aired, and ironed already. It’s thoroughly worn out. I think we’ve had enough “I want to be me!” scenarios to carry us through to the next decade.

If you are going to trot out yet another misunderstood artist fights narrow minded mother play, then offer us a fresh take at the very least. In Untitled, we get instead an intense half-in-the-shadows-half-in-the-light dance routine from Ken to demonstrate his inner turmoil and desire to break free. Such a scene has the added risk - if not constructed, choreographed and performed well – of making the audience think that maybe Ken is not cut out to be a dancer after all. So, did Alfred Loh nail it? Lets just say it was yawn and giggles at the cliché-ness of it all.

Untitled’s saving grace is the fact that it’s the first play by Johann. It feels more like it belongs where most first efforts do -- in high school, or in The Platform. Staged in a professional space however, the weakness that one might overlook elsewhere - stilted dialogue, formulaic plots -- don’t get off so lightly. Hopefully, when Johann does write his next play, as indeed he should, we’ll see art work that benefits from the staging of Untitled.

Uncut by Teng Ky-Gan

Teng Ky-Gan and his contribution -- Uncut -- sadly fails to redeem Johann’s lack of experience. He takes on the preachy vein, and tells us the story of Zakaria, the fictional Director of the Film Censorship Bureau (try not to curse under your breath). Hafidzuddin Fish Fazil portrays the tormented King of the Moral High-Ground. Ky-Gan has his actor spew endless monologues about the necessity of censorship, and the filth of free-thinking.

Perhaps stuck in musical-mode, Ky-Gan (whos credits include composing and writing for Tunku The Musical and Broken Bridges) appears to have forgotten the timeless law of non-musical theatre: actions speak louder than words. Ky-Gan chooses words, and many words did his characters speak! It would have been a more nuanced play -- and a more challenging role for Fish -- if we were left to ponder over Zakaria’s inner conflict, than be told about it so explicitly.

Aishah Sinclair plays the sexy liberal artist attempting to have the ban on her documentary lifted. Censorship is something every arts person is familiar with, but Ky-Gan’s attempt to portray a person’s struggle between didactic logic and carnal desires is nothing more than a play on stereotypes. A fool can see the ‘twist’ ending a mile away, and Ky-Gan unwittingly portrays the liberal arts movement as nothing more than blackmailing sex sirens eager to play games.

Thank goodness for intermissions.

The break distanced the audience from thez preachy feel of the first act, and allowed us to get on to Mark Beau de Silva’s Paper House with fresh eyes.

Two sisters meet again when Kim (Maybel Chan) returns to the paper doll shop that Yen (Bella Rahim) cares for, at the anniversary of their mother’s death. Yen, the superstitious small-town girl is outraged when Kim, the less superstitious, KL-ite, sister, allows a lost little girl food and shelter in their humble abode. Bella Rahim, portraying Yen, breaks your heart as she slowly brings you to the realization that her deep-rooted superstitions and routine stem from an emotional turmoil that Kim has yet to fully appreciate.

There is a marked difference here between the choices made by Mark and the previous two writer/directors. Mark uses a device Ky-Gan and Johann missed in Directing 101 -- subtlety. Instead of Yen announcing to the audience how much she misses her mother, we are left to discover this in the way Yen refuses to change things for sales’ sake in her mother’s old shop, and defends her ways -- “You think this is a joke, ah?”

Mark’s work is by no means worthy of endless praise, but one cannot help but wish Johann and Ky-Gan had taken notes.

All three plays, however, are marred by the silly set pieces. Boxes that were supposed to serve as multi-purpose tools of imagination were often just in the way. It was annoying to watch the actors move them around. It was distracting enough that the actors were constantly miming props, without being confused as to what box was supposed to be what at different times. If you’re going to mime props, why not go all the way and mime the useless boxes too?

In all, the three seemed not to have any connecting themes or share common directorial ground to lift the Triple Bill beyond a collection of works by three friends bolstering each other up. And much bolstering did they need, though we can only hope these young writer/directors learn from their mistakes.

~

Yasmin Zetti Martin writes Kakiseni.

Triple Bill: “Uncut”, “Untitled”, & “Paper House” runs at Pentas 1, Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre, Sentul Park, Jalan Strachan (Off Jalan Ipoh), Kuala Lumpur, from Fri 14 to Sun 23 March 2008 (Tue - Sat: 8.30pm; Sun: 3pm, NO show on Mon). Tickets cost RM25/15.

 

 View on a single page

User Comments

posted by yusuf martin, Sat 29.03.200823:52:50 PM
Readers say: (So-so, but makes a valid point)
My wife and I watched the three plays in Ipoh, in a decent size theatre which unfortunately was poorly attended. Shame on Ipohites there as there are too few works of this calibre which venture north of Kl.

Untitled
Well acted as were all three plays. We lost a little dialogue when the script had to compete with music - radio mikes would have helped here.
The story was a little well worn - tension between Mother and Son, balance counter balance brother and sister.
Unfortunately the story was not able to develop sufficiently in the time it was given,another ten minutes would have helped the story I felt.

Uncut
Nice two hander with a melodramatic 'fish', well acted as one would expect. I felt that the dialogue was a little stiff and let Fish down on more than one occasion. More dramatic lighting would have set the scene particularly in the reflective moments.

Paper House
Saving the best till last - let the audience leave having sampled some of the best dialogue of the evening and excellent interaction between the two sisters.

Despite an obvious plot the cast carried the story and their interactions beautifully. However one small observation is that both cast members tended to pass things through the child/ghost as if she wasn't there! Wilful suspension of disbelief can only be stretched so far I fear.

On the whole a good evening and well chosen cast. The writers need to give a little thought to the criticism given, and directors to the physical surroundings, lighting props etc.

Could I do better - nope!

 

posted by bobbystrong, Thu 27.03.200817:23:45 PM
Readers say: (Good post)
Every play has it's own way of telling stories. And every story has it's own format and style. I'm sending all my respect and appreciation to all three for being brave and bold writing these completely contrasting plays. Without the contrast, the whole performance will be boring. So, once again, well done to the writers/directors, the actors, and the crew involved in this.

A few opinions for the actors in the first, actors should take all their time. The pace in general was tight, but there should be more pauses in between lines. Just to allow the lines to sink in into their bodies instead of one line after another. Pauses doesn't mean that there's no activities. Pauses creates tension and that's what the audiences are longing for in the first play.. Conflict. I'm not saying that it is not there, it's there so obvious on the words in the scripts. Perhaps, just let the word speaks for itself? Instead of trying too hard to express it. But i must say good job on using your voice and its dynamics to help create the tension on the stage. So keep up the good work! Good stage crafts too...

For the second play, it was a little bit larger than life and was too caught up with the story except until the last part came. Before she took out the voice recorder out of her handbag, perhaps she faces the front instead of showing her back to the audience? It'll be good to be able to see her facial expression and her body language since this is like the 'alamak' moment. Perhaps, actors can look at/facing the audience while actually talking to the other actors instead of having the need to look at the other actor at all time. Eg. I'm saying "I hate you", but I'm looking at the audience. But other than cheating out, well written play!! Smart one...

In my opinion, the last play was the hardest for the actors. They have the crying moment, the playful moment, and even the larger than life moment...the ghost, where their imaginary circumstances play important part. Just because there were different moments within the play, it is really important to able to let one moment go and let a new moment come. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking "oh, that moment is done, now I'm in a new moment" before actually doing it. When that happens, it reveals the actors acting it rather than doing it. An actor's job is to do it, and not to act it. The originality of the play was fantastic, except for some mat sallehs went "hahaha... hmm..what?". Interesting stage directions and storyline tho'...

These thoughts are mainly for the actors because I was amazed how excellent the listening and responding between characters and how well they were being in the moment. One thing that I would wish to see the actors do next time in next production(or others) is to relax. Often, we are being put on stage and thinking 'oh damn, lines!' and being all nervous, we forgot to have fun... So perhaps, have fun and relax next time? :-))

 

posted by CY, Mon 24.03.200816:38:01 PM
Where are the female playwrights?

 

posted by pang, Mon 24.03.200813:03:14 PM
"Ky-Gan unwittingly portrays the liberal arts movement as nothing more than blackmailing sex sirens eager to play games." Yasmin, you made it sound like it was a bad thing!

 

posted by two times the joy, Sun 23.03.200801:52:35 AM
Sorry,I made a blooper..I meant "Untitled" was amateurished and too weak a story, whereas "Uncut" is very original and daring in exploring the censorship scene in M'sia.. I agree with flutterby in his/her comments on Ky-Gan's beautifully-written plot and scripts! I was enjoying myself thoroughly. Contrary to Flutterby's comment, on the night when I watched the triple bill, the audiences were enjoying themselves in both latter plays - no sign of restlessness during Mark's play even.. We can't wait for the next one! It was definitely a great night in KLPAC for my friends and I that night, minus the first play..

 

posted by ..., Sat 22.03.200812:11:01 PM
Was it really a twist ending for Uncut? It would have been a twist if she'd consented to having sex with him. She kept shooting him down, and then she played with him for about 2 seconds, and then she brought him down to earth with a thump.
I don't think Ky-Gan meant it to be a twist! Why do plays have to have twists anyway? Why do people look for twists? And why must you say that you could see the ending a mile away? Obviously if you could see it, then you were meant to see it! Some plays just don't revolve around the element of surprise. Is that so hard to understand?
Good work, Ky-Gan, for not bending to the rules of twist endings!

 

posted by Flutterby, Sat 22.03.200811:44:11 AM
Readers say: (Outstanding post!)
I think that Ky-Gan should be commended for tackling such a tough issue as censorship in Malaysia. It's a topic so often bandied around in kopitiams that people become numb to it's sensitivity and start thinking when the LPF bans yet another film from cinemas across the country - "We'll buy the uncensored DVD when it comes out."

But what he highlighted was the plight of our own countrymen whose films are banned (Amir Muhammad). Where will they be shown then? That I think is very brave of him. How this play was passed by the Censorship Board, though, I'd like to know. :)

Ky-Gan chose to move through unchartered waters unlike Johann and Mark, instead of writing what he knows, he wrote what he felt strongly about. And I think that is what made Uncut stand out. Instead of the familiarity of Untitled and the homey-ness of Paper House, we got an actual thinking play, where the audience left pondering the issues that were raised, and could question the characters and the plot movement.

Slightly stereotypical characterisation, sure, but stereotypes and cliches and platitudes only become thus because they are the ultimate description of something. And furthermore characters were not purely black and white. Aishah's character was not the quintessential pure-as-the-driven-snow liberal who gets violated; she made moves on him, made the first move, in fact. And Zakaria wasn't your made-to-order villain either; you could see his internal struggle, and the regret at the end was NOT just because of the impending threat of losing his job. It was more his knowledge that he has fallen from God's grace than anything else. Fish and Ky-Gan have done superbly at contrasting and reconciling different aspects of Zakaria's character. And Aishah, I can't believe this is her first stage role, she's utterly believable and real, and altogether too gorgeous for words.

I think the lines were beautifully written and the continuity of the piece (read: when the beginning and ending interloped) was wonderfully segued. Ky-Gan should stop writing musicals and concentrate on pieces such as these. You would never have thought that the limp lyrics of Tunku, and Uncut's luscious word-play were written by the same person.

The lack of movement didn't bother me, I felt that it was much stronger when they stood still, and just used their words. Because the words were so powerful, that you needed them to be still so that you could feel the true effect. They used the boxes much more cleverly than the other two plays, with minimal movement, and Aishah's jumping on the tall box to pull Zakaria near her was just yummy.

The others have done a good job as well, particularly Johann, as this is his maiden effort. I look forward to seeing more of him. Fang was unrecognisable but spot-on! Amelia was not very necessary, but I think Alfred's dance was the highlight of the play!

Mark lacked his usual punch, it was altogether too long, especially when compared to the snappiness of the first 2 plays. You had the audience checking their watches after half an hour. And some lines were lost due to slurring and mumbling, probably because the actors had so many lines that they felt hurried to finish them all off.

But I hope more plays will come from this talented trio.

 

posted by justkeepingtabs, Fri 21.03.200817:58:25 PM
Cliched or not.
I think the essence of theatre, which seeks to entertain and leave some kind of impression, seems to get lost in this elite art circle some malaysians tend to create by their 'higher than thou' attitude to art.

Frankly, I thought all 3 plays left an impression, in all its simplicity and effort to relate. And I came with intelligent non-theatre people who really just wanted to enjoy a good night out at the theatre. And yeah we've seen those stupendous, gloriously written but empty plays around the world, yasmin.


Yeah, johann's play tugs at familiar veins and probably needs some character tightening and imagination, but it relates. And it wasnt boring. It was funny. It was real. We identify with it. The guy is probably writing what he knows, and trying to keep it as raw as possible. We dont have enough of that around these days. Why cant playwrights just write what they know!! instead of trying to go into unchartered territory and doing stuff that just wastes people's time? Just elite people trying to make plays that seem intelligent but bore the hell out of poeple.
Stop saying things like "overdone". Shit, people go through this kinda stuff everyday in what you think is their beautiful perfect looking homes and beyond the oversized elite theatre star ego. If somebody stops talking about it then we'll just end up with one crap surreal made-up society. We just need to find creative ways to talk about it.

Kygan's play, a little wordy, rather hypothetical and stereotype in its character and situation, but definitely sends a message across about hypocrisy in all its glory, and the difficult and stupid decisions we humans make in our everyday lives. The play had something to say.We like it. i think people got the message.

Mark's play,was superb and special in its ability to communicate the intricacies of a relationship between 2 sisters and their responsibility to their mother veiled under a chinese paraphernalia business. It's clear he has talent, though I thought the acting wasnt tight at certain areas, bit monotonous and too many low energy postures. (sitting down, squatting, possibly losing the audience ere an there. Nevertheless, we enjoyed it loads.

Think we have potentially 3 very bright artists in our midst. Keep doing what you're doing, keep it real, and just get better at it.

 

posted by Two Times the Joy, Fri 21.03.200816:55:17 PM
Yasmin's review carries with it a sting to the playwrights & directors - first time or not. I have to agree with some of her points, but I also beg to differ in some.

I'm not a certified critic, but personally, I think musicals are where actions and tunes carry weight, whereas plays place more importance on the words articulated and facial expressions - at least that's what I would expect when I walk into a theatre or musical hall.

I did not enjoy much from Uncut, as everyone has mentioned it is too much of a cut from high school plays. The conflict of an aspiring performer with the mother, the sister who's always supportive, the son who can never communicate with the mother, a so-called-real-life story - this play lacks the depth, has a very weak storyline and is too amateurish to be staged along the other plays; Uncut should've been taken to "The Platform" instead of being staged as a "professional play" just to launch the playwright into the professional art scene.

It could have been a blessing in disguise that the first play is not deep enough, as it provides audiences with lower expectations in the 2nd play. Or, maybe it was just the playwright's choice of work, I find Untitled more original and very daring to stage the reality of censorship in Malaysia. What I love most from the 2nd play is the word-play. True, there weren’t many movements, but it was made up by the "real" expressions and right intonations from the cast - it did not feel as boring as hearing a person read. Towards the end, I believe Ky-Gan could have made it better if Fish did not have to repeat the same lines that were uttered in the beginning just for the audience to make sense. Not many could relate to the story, but the word play in this play is definitely worth commending. There's definitely space for improvement, but I think it was a great start to his professional directing and play writing.

Of all the 3 plays, Paper House to me would be the best play with the right inundations, layered meanings and one better cast than the other. Mark has scored again with his timeless tales meant to bring back the values of family and traditions - although there were parts when the cast seems to be thinking too much of her next lines than to portray the right facial expressions, I made allowances because there were stories left untold, or rather subtle lines to show how much the sisters missed the mother. But then again, there were also parts that made the play seem a little too drag-gy.

I would say all 3 plays have their own strength and weakness - some more strengths than the other. True to Yasmin's words, when it's staged alongside each other, you can't help but compare - but hey, that's where growth comes from. I'd say kudos to the playwrights and directors for their originality (not meant for the first play), and I definitely await more growth in the next play you (Ky-Gan & Mark) stage!

By the way, I went to watch it on the first day itself, and I’d like to correct the stereotypes of first day is not the best time to watch – because the cast did great even on the premier. Great job!

 

posted by Norman, Fri 21.03.200815:51:25 PM
Readers say: (Dey, get real!)
As an avid theatre lover and observer, the three plays were quite painful to watch. Regardless whether it is a person's first time to write or direct a play, the text and the script were very weak.

The dialogue and stories lack depth to an extent which I felt underestimated the intelligence of the audience that watched, with stereotype cliched entry points.

I don't have a high expectations when I go watch plays, but honestly I felt like I was watching 3 high school plays.

 

posted by Inessa Irdayanty, Fri 21.03.200813:35:05 PM
Readers say: (Dey, get real!)
I do not have qualifications to judge a play but i have watched numerous plays since small. This doesn't mean that anybody must agree with what I am about to say,just like how not everybody needed to agree with what Yasmin Zetti Martin had to say in her review. There are certain things I agreed with her though(you might recognise quotes from her review). For instance,the repetitive dialogue;Amelia's role as a comic relief and the clichéd subject in Untitled. I also agree that in Uncut,it might have worked better if the audience were left to ponder over Zakaria's inner conflict, than be told about it expicitly. And about a fool being able to see the 'twist' ending a mile away,yeah,that's kinda true. When the twist was unfold, I myself went "I knew it!". The final thing I agree with is the subtlety in Paper House,like how Yen refused to change things for sale's sake. However,I didn't find the multi-purpose tools silly, neither did I have a problem with the three plays not having a common theme or share common directorial ground. The show,like many others,has its flaws,but it was still rather enjoyable.

 

posted by lainie., Fri 21.03.200813:34:32 PM
Readers say: (Outstanding post!)
eh eh...a review is a personal opinion, much like the comment you just left.

not that i think her qualifications matter, but what DO you know of yasmin anyway? it says something when you criticise the person and not the review. what did you think was missing in the article besides that you disagree with her?

looking forward to seeing the play this week johann!

 

posted by Do, Fri 21.03.200811:18:24 AM
Readers say: (Outstanding post!)
Doy, why do we have to listen to reviewers with no qualifications to judge theatre other than the fat theasaurus on their laps as they write? I enjoyed all three plays thoroughly. It's a testament to their quality that people (like me) are repeat customers. And both nights that I've been were full houses! Kudos to Johan, Ky Gan and Mark.

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment