search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?



BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

- Arthur Schopenhauer
You are not logged in.
articles

 View on multiple pages

28. 03. 2006
Project Runaway by Antares

M! The Opera, staged at Istana Budaya from Thu 23 Mar to Sun 2 Apr 2006, is arguably the most ambitious and esoteric piece of music theatre ever conceived and produced in Malaysia. I’m awed by Saidah Rastam’s perseverance and stamina, and gratified that after such a protracted incubation, her monumental vision has finally materialised. She was aided and abetted by a handful of doggedly dedicated, competent, and resourceful individuals, with whom she was able to share her grand vision, and without whom the show simply wouldn’t have happened. Saidah was fortunate, too, to have found herself a cast and technical crew whose epic enthusiasm, talent, and passion went beyond the routine call of professional duty.

It was a VERY expensive production, of course, approaching two million ringgit, and the fact that so many corporate sponsors – with YTL leading the way – dug deep into their pockets to support the show augurs well for their commitment to nurturing the performing arts in Malaysia.

For this we have the late Datin Paduka Sri Endon Mahmood to thank. As the wife of the prime minister, Kak Endon invested a great deal of effort in encouraging artistic development. Now her daughter, Nori Abdullah, has taken on this important role as Chairman of Yayasan Budi Penyayang Malaysia, the foundation her well-beloved and much-missed mother established, to nurture a love of aesthetics and culture. Another positive factor has been the pro-active stance taken by the present Minister of Culture, Arts and Heritage, Datuk Seri Utama Dr Rais Yatim, whose tenure has seen a vibrant burgeoning of government-supported artistic endeavours.

Having declared my fond appreciation of this bold and groundbreaking enterprise, it might seem petty to mention the production’s shortcomings, rather than emphasise its glorious accomplishments. However, it would be remiss of me to gloss over problematic areas, so I’ll attend to that and get it over with, in the hope that future stagings of M! The Opera will benefit from some honest feedback.

While it’s true that the music is by far the most important element in any operatic work, it also helps to have a well-defined story and memorable characters. If Jit Murad (a truly fine wordsmith, though famously fragile) had maintained his focus as librettist, the dramatic flow of M! The Opera might have attained greater cohesion and conviction. But Jit apparently ran out of steam along the way, leaving the task of shaping the libretto to director/dramaturg Jo Kukathas and actor/singer Khir Rahman. Scripts written by committee rarely work, no matter how expert the members may be. What transpired in the end was that the chief protagonist, M the “iconic, enigmatic” fashion designer, was insufficiently developed as a character – while his antagonist, the murderously competitive Kerabat, had all the powerful moves as the “villain of the piece.”

And thus Singaporean actor George Chan’s Kerabat stole the thunder from Khir Rahman’s M – and, despite the latter’s large reserves of charisma and talent, he was left grappling with the mere myth of M rather than the man. Khir acted and sang and postured superbly, but we felt little for M and his trials and tribulations as an overnight sensation in the fickle world of haute couture. When M pricks his finger on the talismanic needle, we half expect him to fall into a hundred-year catatonia... but, instead, he winds up poisoned by his wedding outfit (presented by Guess Who). Sepi, M’s hapless bride and lifelong muse, was remarkable in her operatic expression of grief – but few in the audience felt anything but relief that the melodrama was finally over. I don’t know if it’s possible at this stage to alter the libretto, but the fit isn’t quite perfect between the sublimity of the score and the banality of the plot.

The tenuous dramatic thread that held the show together was kept from snapping by the wonderful quality of singing and dancing throughout. Doreen Tang, as Sepi, was particularly impressive, proving conclusively that we have world-class opera singers in our midst. Paula Malai Ali as Dominique Soong was a real pleasure to behold (in view of her long absence from the boards), and the child performers – Elyssa Murni Johari Azmi and Mohammad Taufik – easily won the audience’s hearts. Jo Kukathas’s staging was so kaleidoscopically kinetic, it was difficult to keep tabs on individual performers, but the energetic ensemble of veterans and newbies performed admirably, and I’m sure many of the cast will attest that being involved with M! The Opera has vastly upgraded their vocal and balletic skills.

Top kudos to music directors Ahmad Muriz Che Rose and Roland Peelman (artistic director of the prestigious Song Company of Australia, whose collaboration was facilitated by the Australian High Commission), and to choreographer Judimar Hernandez, who did a superlative job – as did the 43-piece orchestra (featuring the venerable Michael Veerapen on jazz piano) – in bringing to life the dynamic intensity and dense complexity of Saidah Rastam’s quirkily ingenious and sophisticated score. Fluidly blending six disparate musical modalities – 1960s Malay pop, Broadway, contemporary jazz fusion, courtly nobat, shamanic percussion, and polytonal dissonances (inspired by the neoclassical symphonic avant-garde) – Saidah has ventured further from the musical mainstream than any other Malaysian composer, with idiosyncratic bravado and classy flair. Her work would stand out anywhere in the world, and it has.

However, a comment I heard afterwards – and which I feel has some validity – is that the score was too heavyweight for such a featherweight dramatic concept. The audience was well forewarned: the fact that they were attending an OPERA, not a musical, was clearly advertised in the title of the work itself. In this instance one can’t simply sit back, relax, and enjoy the show; one has to pay close attention in order to derive aesthetic satisfaction. And even so, one is unlikely to be heard humming any of the tunes at the end of the show.

As pure spectacle, M! The Opera presented a phantasmagoric parade of fabulous costumes designed by top names in fashion (including Bernard Chandran, Bill Keith, Raymond Jolly, Tom Abang Saufi, Nazleen Noor, and Wan Huzairil), all tastefully coordinated by Dominique Devorsine. The simple but stunning set, brainchild of Goh Boon Teck (artistic director of Singapore’s Toy Factory Theatre Ensemble), was sensitively illuminated by freelance lighting designer Dorothy P’ng, also from Singapore. They were ably aided by the ubiquitous Mac Chan who served as technical director.

I believe we may have finally arrived at the point where it’s no longer something to crow about when all the races are able to set differences aside and put on a theatrical extravaganza of exportable quality. The fact that diverse talents from Malaysia, Australia, Singapore, New Caledonia, and Venezuela are collaborating to shape the further evolution of Malaysian culture and put it confidently on the world stage should also elicit no more than a vigorous nod of approval (why waste money on a full page ad?) but we are permitted a spontaneous whoop of triumph. And to witness the dramatic metamorphosis of a dear friend – from reluctant lawyer to impassioned composer of hybrid operas – is indeed a very special kind of joy. A champagne toast to the brave and beautiful cast and production team of M! The Opera. And especially to executive producer Sunita Rajakumar and producer Chacko Vadaketh: considering the arduous, potholed road the production had to travel, from its inception to the illustrious Istana Budaya, they have midwifed nothing less than a miracle, even if it still looks like a work-in-progress.

M! the Opera runs at Istana Budaya from Thu 23 Mar - Sun 2 Apr 2006. Tickets are practically sold out. However, extra shows have been made available. Tel: 603-7726 2002; 603-4026 5558.

~ ~ ~

Antares is a walking hybrid opera.

Photos by Alex Wan

 View on multiple pages

User Comments

posted by alex
I have commented previously on the other page, and have been interested to see the varying views grow (and groan) on this posting board.
Sparks flying and accusations being made that the good posts are only from those connected with the opera whilst of course I am sure that all of the negative comments are from completely unbiased audience members! ;)
From someone who just went along to see what it was all about, I appreciated this homegrown production, with both ambitious and challenging artistic styles adopted to present a truly modern take on Malaysian performing arts.
Don't let the bad stuff get you down M team. Keep up the good fight.

 

posted by WG2K
what was with the howling at the end? really, its a serious question. and what was the twist ending? something about kerabat and m being brothers? i couldnt hear the words and the rtm subtitles didnt help.

overall, nice work by some people - judimar with the choreography, dominique with the costumes; but not so good work from the others - poor khir who was thoroughly miscast, the sopranos (or whatever) who overcompensated with their so-called operatic singing, the sound technicians who should be sacked (dont blame the hall), and sadly the director-writer-songwriter troika.

its not enough to get a can-do appreciation for their efforts. this is a must-do-better wake-up call for the three of them. everyones allowed moments of weakness - and madness. but there can only be one winner, and if the audience is voting, this opera would have been sent off at the beginning of the competition.

 

posted by Upholding Steven
Can Kakiseni be taken seriously? Prove it you have integrity before propagating the idea of truth in reporting. To have cancelled a category in your music category because your judges didn't watch the shows to save your own asses, do you think that's truth? And proudly admitting it. M! Opera would have a chance cos Jo Kukathas is Kakiseni's best friend. But there isn't a chance for Saidah. Let's repeat the words, cronyism and nepotism, and signs of them can be seen all over this website, and those alone can substantiated by questioning your judges, or everyone related to Kakiseni, and then link critically what they have said to all reviews and award results. The first question, Are the credentials of Kakiseni true? What are Pang's & Kathy's qualifications? Do the judges in the Boh Cameronian Arts Awards have integrity? Does Kakiseni have integrity? And le'ts not accuse these anonymous poster before you yourselves can prove you have integrity.

 

posted by Richard Yeoh, Chairman of Philharmonic Society of Selangor
I noticed there some who criticise and abuse others' comments. What the hell is this? If you do not accept that people are free to express their views without being scorn, you should get out of this site. We don't need vigilantes or mob rule here. We have enough of that in our politicians.
Also, if you want to be abusive, at least have the guts to stand by what you write. Don't hide behind a pseudonymn, that is cowardly!

 

posted by Elaine
(I feel moved to comment now, definitely pushing wordage past my 'infamous' review, but Pang, totalling the words in 2 places, some repeated in both pages, bit skewered maths eh?)

Everyone, but EVERYONE, with the vaguest interest in the KL arts scene has heard about the chaotic past years in bringing this show to stage. Sponsorship issues, venue issues, actors singers directors dropping out and coming on board, 11th hour finalisation and 13th hour arrangement changes, egos and ids battling backstage... after all the drama, when I saw it, I was amazed they even pulled it off and got a show - of any quality - on stage. A lot of people were called upon to undertake tasks beyond or outside their capabilities and talents. So yes, in that sense, M! was a miracle.

Is it the business of the reviewer to acknowledge only that? I also saw it twice, once on Opening and again on Gala Night at the end. While it was better – tighter – it’s still unfinished. I don’t think you need classical training to see that, no matter whether you call it an opera or a musical. This is not an ICT revue.

With Saidah, Jit and Jo at the helm, M! had the entire arts community rooting for them, even if a little grudgingly, because it represented a lot of blood sweat and tears, as they/we all know. (I, for example, refused a commission from a hotel magazine that insisted I compare it with PGL-M. In the end, that story was done by Antares as well). I think it would be fair to say that at the end of the day, a lot of people went because of the hype and most felt rather – shall we say, confused? – at the final product. Yes, expectations were high; yes; fusion is not everyone’s cup of tea; yes, M! had to overcome huge production obstacles inherent to local productions in this country... none of this overcomes the fact that M! is an unfinished product pushed onstage and sold to the public.

I was there when the PM led the standing ovation. I was there clapping madly during curtain call because I felt bad at the lacklustre and half-hearted applause. I was there when people left during intermission, and even during the show itself. I was there watching numerous heads in the rows in front of me nodding off or swivelling around to look at wood carvings on the wall. In total, I watched the show with 5 different people whose most positive reaction was a nervous giggle and a quick change of subject: where are we going for supper?

As a reviewer, I cannot agree that for us to mention the negative qualities means less sponsorship for you. Sponsors are a small handful here; what one show doesn’t get means another show might get it. I know personally that at least 2 sponsors were unhappy with the production process and the final product, rather than upset at negative reviews. I also cannot agree that the editor is doing a disservice to the industry by hyping the interest or balancing a viewpoint. Hype and interest is NEVER bad in this day and age of information saturation. As a writer, I can tell you that every single piece of work we submit is edited and published as the editor sees fit, ESPECIALLY the title and subheadings. This is an editor’s right and responsibility – and it is not something you cry foul over (publicly). What about Jenny’s article – Saidah! The Phenomenon - ?

That’s my 588 words.

 

posted by Rey Buono
Ah, yes, Chacko, corporate sponsorship, international festivals, Tan Sri Francis asking “his people” for a tape, the Prime Minister leading a standing ovation and enthusing in his Perdana all the way back to Putrajaya, Ministers thrilled and thrilled! How far Malaysian theatre has come!

I remember another time, when English speaking theatre practitioners spoke honestly, simply, sometimes even courageously, not from Palaces of the Arts or impressive facilities hidden away in future gated communities, but from unpretentious, approachable venues like the theatrette in Wisma Tun Sabanthan, the experimental box at the Lake Garden, and, of course, that wonderful Platonic cave of shadows under Dateran Merdeka.

I remember a time when a few thousand ringgit from a beer company was enough to put something credible on the stage (or not so credible, but that’s ok, it wasn’t costing a bundle), when the Prime Minister was an object of satire, when students were able to afford the ten or fifteen ringgit for a performance which they could reach by public transport, when you never knew what you would experience next in the little black box, when audiences, and DBKL, were challenged and re-challenged,

Call me nostalgic, call me old-fashioned, but I miss those times. When I read all the stuff on this page, I miss them more! Ah, the flood, the flood!

 

posted by The Shrimp Warrior
The paradigm shift you proffered is truly seismical.

Often I am thinking, the state of our arts is because many are not hungry enough, and many are also quite greedy.

But I think we are all doing as best as what we are all capable of doing -- which still is not so very good lah.

Sigh.

 

posted by Sheena Gurbakhash
For whatever it's worth, I'm throwing my 5sen worth of opinion into the pot. First of all, everyone who worked on M- well done. It took tremendous stamina to get the production up and running. Announced almost two years ago, the story of how M got on stage is probably more interesting than the plot of M. But that said, it takes incredible courage to hang on to a creative idea and work on it every single day bringing it closer to fruition- and while this is true of every single creative effort, I think it is more true of M, because love it or hate it, M is something none of us has ever seen before and from some of the reviews and comments here some of you will probably never want to see again. But that's not really the point.

The POINT IS that M has set a benchmark, whether you love it or hate it, (notwithstanding nostalgia for the days when a small sponsorship from a beer or FMCG company allowed a small and totally experimental production in Wisma Tun Sambanthan) M is testament to the fact that Malaysian theatre has come a long way.

As a writer and someone who loves theatre, M opened my eyes to possibilites. I now know it is is possible to get decent funding. (I appreciate the networking, marketing and all the other aspects of selling that must have gone into getting Government and private sponsorship and also very realistically realise that these opportunities are not available to every production) The fact remains that it is there, and it is POSSIBLE.

M has taught me that is is POSSIBLE to sell out a show in a venue the size of Istana Budaya, that there are that many curious, interested, participative people who want to watch and be involved in a show. (It was a scant 10 years ago when it was commonly believed that the extent of a theatre audience in KL was 300 people and if all 300 actually came for a production it was a miracle!)

M has taught it that it is POSSIBLE to stay true to an idea, an ideal and see it THROUGH and not let it be high-jacked by venue choices, lack of funds, the caprice of sponsors, theatre politics, life crises and all the other thousand things that assault a creative work on it's way to the stage.

I am not saying that M is by any means perfect, but it is bold, and different, and it comes from a wilingness to take creative risks. I have no doubt that it would have been far easier to write a "safe" production, with "safe" likable tunes that we could all have come out humming- (though I am still haunted by the "there is no time" song which still plays in my head on an almost daily basis when I am stressed- (I want it as my ring tone please.)

I agree with Antares's initial review. Musically it was very stong. Plot-wise, I think it needs some work with more character definition. You have to really love M if you want is to be devestated by his death and for me anyway, that never really happened.) Sets, lighting design and costumes were as big as they needed to be for that venue. With hindsight it's easy to say could have been pushed further, but great nonetheless. The hanging dress dummies and pin-curtains were enigmatic, interesting and relevant.

I think everyone involved has done a great job- and yes,I maybe accused of being biased because many of the people involved are people I know- but i am honest enough to know crap when I see it, and say so and M was NOT. So congratulations and thank you Saidah, in particular, for once more astounding us musically, and to every other single person involved in M for an elegant, throughful, and most of all INTERESTING theatre experience.

 

posted by An Anonymous Poster
Do we have an editor who can't even spell? The editor's qualifications and experience should seriously be questioned. And also the integrity of Kakiseni. It got away for cancelling some music categories in the 2003 Boh Cameronian Arts Awards, after the judges didn't watch the shows, and you call this justice to artists? And to cover their asses, they blamed it on the judges, without realizing it's Kakiseni who cannot handle the judges. If something like this could happen, I am not surprised if anything and anything at all could happen in regards to trying to cover its own ass after a big big mess, either editorially or regarding the awards.

On anonymous posters, who are we to say who's a coward and who's not? Get real, this is the internet, and people do have a choice to either use their real name or not, unless the system does not allow it. Does Kakiseni allow anonymous posters to post comments? What constitutes comments that are defamatory, rude or generally deemed unsuitable? I don't think it's a question of being courageous and cowardly. It's foolhardy to immediately label people as cowards, without thinking that the system, indeed allows these anonymous posters. And anonymous posters will continue posting criticisms, unless Kakiseni is smart enough to track fraudulent postings. If something good like remaining anonymous after donating money to the poor is commended, I don't see why providing contructive criticisms and remaining anonymous should be considered cowardly. The media indeed should be watched, and thanks to the Internet, people are now speaking, criticizing and questioning the media instead of blindly misguided by the media who will most probably be concerned with vested interests, instead of journalistic ethics. Continue probing and questioning, whether or not you are an anonymous poster.

 

posted by Quentin Dahl
The comments here are way more interesting than the show itself.

As for M!Opera? It felt like an overblown and overdramatic RTM movie. For something that's suppose to be a breakthrough it was a great disappointment.

Ironically, the only person there who I enjoyed watching was Azean, a well-known RTM actor...heh. Shows how far the quality has fallen no?

 

posted by alex
you hear that music ever on RTM? - nonsense. You really must have been snoozing, and only seen the flashback kampung baru bit. And what is it with people that they need a story so spelled out that there is no need to use your brain at all?

 

posted by we are malaysians caring malaysians we are comitted to???
Dear Fellow Malaysians

I marvel at your appreciation and support for a scene that is definitely in its infancy and will continue to be as long as the consumer/audiences bench marks for a good musical is PGL.

I have nothing against PGL; I enjoyed it for what it was.

What you really need to do Saidah, is leave this country and write for an audience that can understand and appreciate your music.

AS for the production…

If only REAL funding could be achieved! (with out being at the mercy of governmental and major corporate organizations, who provide support at a cost)

For production of this size to be fully realized, M should have taken at least 6-12 months from when the funding was achieved, providing the whole cast and team with full time employment and fees that would justify the amount of time and effort required to make a production work.

Judging by the press conference funding was only secured by February.

What should have happened: The governmental bodies, YTL and all other sponsors should have said; here’s the money you have 6 months from February to finish the music, develop the script, train the singers and actors and put on a show that could prove Malaysia ‘boleh’ make a musical/opera that is bold, experimental and original.

Bottom line there is so little happening of any interest artistically and intellectually, anyone who wants a nite out that does not involve going to a shopping mall for entertainment will be watching.

I wonder how many of you people who didn’t enjoy the show would actually bother to go and see anything similar if you lived in London for example???

M! was never written for the masses, so that’s why masses have passed judgement!

Clueless

 

posted by Quentin Dahl
"you hear that music ever on RTM? -
nonsense."

Music or not the plot is something that came out of an RTM show. I couldn't care less about the music. Only one really stuck out, the rest are boring and forgettable. (Like RTM music, IMO)

" You really must have been snoozing, and only seen the flashback kampung baru bit. And what is it with people that they need a story so spelled out that there is no need to use your brain at all?"

Do you even WATCH RTM? Anyone who had the unfortunate luck of watching RTM could recognise the plot ANYWHERE. It practically SCREAMED RTM. Regardless of the music, the sets, costume and all that crap. It was a badly-made melodrama. End of story.

 

posted by feste
just reading the comments convinced me the show has done what it sets out to do. to me art music symbolizes the confusion, contradiction, speed of modern living unlike the repetitious repeating repeats of hitz.fm which is sometimes enjoyable. having said that, saidah's experiences reflects london, paris or america more where this music is flourishing. in kl, things are getting shitty but maybe not to the point of the intensity and the shifts in the music yet. still if you hate it, does it mean you hate modern life? well, i think most artists. so isn't it a success that the production revealed to you what you felt inside or make you project what you hated on stage for you to hate?

look at some of the other productions. harldy any comments. they are ignored and forgotten. love it or hate it, M is for Memory cuz it is something people will remember, reflect and talk about. good or bad, love or hate.

 

posted by Art Critic (Anonymous)
Who are you, you ask. Who am I, philosophers ask. Let me read all comments posted with real names here and you find a mass of mediocre thoughts. Are we analyzing based on who's posting what or what's being posted? And those with mediocre thoughts barge in, accuse anonymous posters as cowards for not revealing themselves, and these posters look right into their eyes and say, "Rubbish, is all I see and the only thoughts worth reading here are those posted by anonymous posters!" Breathe, it's the air you breathe and when you breathe, onlookers sense you are breathing, but they don't ask questions like who's breathing air? Shoddy thinkers are the last thing we need, really.

 

posted by emmm
teater ni kalut....kesian saidah! bersusah payah. saya berpendapat bahawa skrip yang celaru dan pengarahan yang tidak mampu untuk skill besar macam IB.

 

posted by Lizzy Linden
Hello, I am getting tired of people congratulating writer who has done certain way of writing as good by inviting people to comment. Look, people will find a way to comment anyway as they have something to say abot the show and this is an outlet! So please dont feel good about that writers! What kind of writing is that when you want to critic a show then u keep appologising about it. If you dont have the gut to be a critic then dont. Write your opinion, whether it is good or bad ad what actually happened there. Janganlah jadi lalaing ditup angin pulak!

M is crap n waste of time, esp for RM2 mil budget! Singapore was doing that mix n match kind of production or east meets west in the 1970s, at least Dick lee finally got it right in PGL, whether u like the tune or not is another story. I like opera, English Opera etc, Jazz, Malay Pop with some sounds of Jazz, RnB, Hip Hop, Asli, keroncong, Ghazal, Joget, even musical. Does mean I want to hear all that in one night in one production. This is more like the work of MFA composition student. Not to mention he light n stage designs, copy of Spellbound at IB, Esplanade's Reminising the Moon of Boi Shakti, La Galigo of Robert Willson, so so not original! The space was not fully utilise as performance space. A let down of Judy's choreography really ( what's the problem Judy? Not enough people to rehearsal?) I met one actress saying that she went to rehearsal everyday for rehearsal n do some movement, without any song or line to act for a month n left right after.

The work looked like a last minute ensemble after 1 year of sporadic rehearsal while librettist n composer figure out the lines n songs. Next time get a professional set designer to design set, not a theatre director, just to travel to Singapore.

I never liked Paula Malai Ali, but that night Paula was the star as I understad what she was saying! Doreen may be able to throw her voice but fail to articulate her words. Azean was a waste of talent, we know she cant sing, she cut an album long time ago n not selling! Khir was ok, but Kerabat was good.

There was the scene with all dancers wearing black matrix dresses with black floor and shadow, a good designer would not do that, because audience would not e able to see anything!

But at least I like one tune "Nanti" with Khir n Doreen!

Saidah, do again the work and clean up the mess. This comment at kakiseni is a good feedback for next stage, if you get to go to Singapore or Japan!!!!

 

posted by feste
i am still confused why so many people compared M to PGL. imagine if PGL never happened but instead M was done right after Kevin Field doing one of his wednesdays concert with full orchestra at IB. i am sure then the comments will be excellent right. going to M expecting PGL is like eating an apple then expecting the orange to taste the same?

 

posted by Kuching Boy
" Next time get a professional set designer to design set, not a theatre director, just to travel to Singapore."

BRAVO! Also next time collaborate with some foreign professional theater management team. There are cheap outsourcing art service in Eastern Europe and Russia.

Why didn't they start as a chamber opera first?
How about spending 2 millions to start up local first professional stage design and supply company?

 

posted by Kak Kiah Kg.Baru
Rasanya tidak keterlaluan untuk membandingkan M dgn PGL walaupun ianya ibarat apel dan oren, apa guna nak makan apel yang busuk. Kalau orennya manis makanlah oren! kalau dua-dua elok, saya pun nak makan dua-dua, memangnya buah berlainan! Kevin Field to pulak buah anggur, kalau elok saya makan juga, tapi kalau anggur busuk, buanglah!

 

posted by feste
nak makan dengan nak banding lain lah.
mestilah nak makan yang sedap tapi kalau makan satu nee pastu nak semua rasa macam tu je makna kita menghadkan pengalaman kita untuk rasa benda-benda yang baru. kalau u minat oren, seumur hidup pun nak makan oren x salah tapi apa salahnya kalau cuba juga apel, kalau x rasa macam oren tapi cuba juga... mana tau jadi suka, kita yang untung.

kalau soal rosak tak rosak kalau dan cakap pasal banding maknanya dua-dua elok. jangan pula makan oren sedap pastu makan apel ingatkan apel tu rosak sebab rasanya bukan macam apel.

anggur tu ape?

 

posted by JK
There was too much in M for me to take actually. M could've been a bit more minimal and worked stunningly. But then a more minimal M wouldn't have worked in a white elephant space like Istana Budaya. I agree with people's opinions that it was messy. The story was weak, the production reached beyond its grasp. Still, I love Saidah's music. So brave of her to brandish such an agressive, uncompromising piece of work which was at times most vulnerable. How I so wished that this was not an opera. How I so wanted to hear the music as played by the orchestra alone. As far as I'm concerned, the libretto diluted the music. Saidah's not a composer who reaches out. She's one who reaches deep inside and reveals things that we wish we could admit to ourselves. How I wish... how I wish...

 

posted by Classical Connoisseur
This comment is more about Peter Ong... He was the only one in that group to obviously be a non-classical singer.

I think Peter Ong has potential. He has a pop-broadway voice which - if developed properly - could allow him to land roles in London's West End or Broadway.

...But for Opera, I don't think so - YET.

The Verdict: More classical training needed.

In Singapore Lyric Opera's "Opera on Silverscreen", his rendition of Lehar's "Dein ist Mein Ganzes Herz" revealed his layman status in the world of Classical / Opera Singing. His German diction sounded very English (I could swear it seemed American, in fact!). This even turned worse in Verdi's "La Donna e Mobile" which is a very familiar piece of work for Opera Aficionados like myself. As such, only a TRULY CLASSICALLY-TRAINED TENOR's voice (or the voice of a "layman" who's really good at imitating real tenors) fits this aria.

We've all heard "La Donna E Mobile" over and over again in movies and a pop-broadway voice just won't cut it. I mean, if you buy a ticket with the word "OPERA" on it, you expect Opera-style well-projected voices, not pop-broadway throat voices which were meant to be sung with hidden or overhead microphones.

Hey, I'm not dissing Peter Ong here. I'm just saying that I think he shouldn't force himself to come out in opera productions in Malaysia, Singapore, or the rest of the region, until he can start sounding operatic.

I, personally, am not formally trained in the classical school under a mentor-protege (or "master-and-apprentice")type of pedagogical setting. However, I learned to sound "classical" because I joined classical choral groups, where members have no choice but to receive continuous training from the choral conductor and get exposed to proper classical singing. It also helped that I kept listening and imitating real tenors on the CD's I got.

So I think Peter should first get himself singing as a member of a classical choir or a member of the chorus, and only when he learns to modulate his voice to properly sound "classical" and "operatic" (and thus use more of his chest/diaphragm, and not just his throat), then and only then should he be given operatic roles.

It's an insult to us members of the chorus who already have that classical sound to have someone without any real training (worse, without the right voice) get onto centrestage and end up disappointing the audience who were obviously expecting a "TENOR SOUND" (you know, a "Pavarotti" or "Bjoerling"-sounding voice is what I mean!).

In fairness, Peter Ong has great on-stage charisma and acting ability. He has the height, the looks, and the personality for acting onstage. But I think he should start off in REPERTORY-type organisations. He should keep off OPERA PRODUCTIONS until he learns to produce a real operatic tenor voice.

As I said, he's got potential, and his voice is "Good" for pop and broadway musicals. So that's a START. He just needs to learn the RIGHT CLASSICAL TECHNIQUE.

My advice to him and other wannabes (in summary):

1. Keep off opera if you don't have the opera-voice

2. Join classical choirs that specialise in Sacred Music, Madrigals, or join an opera chorus.

3. Get real classical training from a real classical teacher. (I hear the Philippines' University of Santo Tomas has great teachers ---> and it's cheap to live and study in the Philippines too.)

4. Buy lots of CD's of Jussi Bjoerling, Luciano Pavarotti, and Placido Domingo and play them over and over and try copying their voices.

5. Sing whilst in the shower, and try to imitate either Bjoerling, Pavarotti, or Domingo. (Tenors would do well to try imitating Classical Baritone voices just to learn how to modulate and keep away from sounding "pop.")

6. Join Opera productions ONLY when you already have the classical sound. No classical-sounding voice, NO OPERA INVOLVEMENT! - That simple!

7. Have faith that by working hard and following your classically-trained voice coach that you'll get there someday... voice coaches (classical ones) can bring you to learn Bel Canto singing by telling you what not to do and encouraging you with positive reinforcement when you actually do produce the right sound.

8. And if opera-style bel canto singing doesn't fit you, but you still do have a good "pop" or "broadway musical" voice, then please: SWITCH. There's probably more money and a bigger audience in there than in opera.

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment