search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?



BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"In a decaying society, art, if it is truthful, must also reflect decay. And unless it wants to break faith with its social function, art must show the world as changeable. And help to change it."

- Ernst Fischer
You are not logged in.
articles

 View on a single page

25. 02. 2004
Island Fever by Jerome Kugan

You know what? I'm sick of reviewing. So, instead of a review, I've decided to write eight poems, each inspired by watching the eight short plays that made up Alfian Sa'at's latest offering, Landmarks: Asian Boys Vol.2 (directed by Ivan Heng for W!ld Rice) which recently ended its sold out premiere run at the Esplanade Theatre Studio, Singapore (4-15 February 2004). Wait, here, first of all, are the synopses of the plays provided by WildRice.

****

1.

Katong Fugue: Secrets and ties: a son with a hidden life, a mother desperately trying to reach out. Will they break through the walls they have erected, or will they forever languish in a fugue of denial and disguise?

2. Supper at Maxwell: What takes place after an evening of ogling and cruising at the clubs? More of the same, of course. Two buddies compare love notes in this affectionate and affecting comedy of bad table manners.

3. Raffles City Rendezvous: Where does sex end and love begin, and how does one negotiate the treacherous territory in between? A couple finds out... when they celebrate their third anniversary with a threesome.

4. California Dreaming: It’s 8 August, the day of the scene’s loudest, proudest party, but not every circuit boy is raring to brandish the rainbow flag. A wickedly funny, brutally pointed inquiry into the true meaning of freedom.

5. The Kings of Ann Siang Hill: Classic bathhouse scenario: fiftysomething uncle approaches haughty young stud. Will it all end in humiliation, as we expect and dread, or are things perhaps not as obvious as they seem?

6. Downstream Delta: Barely submerged hopes and heartbreak rise to the surface, as two men – one straight, one gay – reminisce about a friendship that develops from a failed pick-up attempt at the pool...

7. My Own Private Toa Payoh: A two-room flat becomes home, sanctuary, world – in this deeply felt and moving story about two rent boys with not much to get by except their love, their dreams, and all their tomorrows.

8. The Widow of Fort Road: A woman is visited by an ex-colleague, whom she used to have a crush on – in the days before the life he’d kept hidden was wrenched from him, publicly laid bare, and shattered.

****

1. And after the island set sail for South, like an immigrant's eyes
post tearful farewells, everything
unfogged itself.
A piano-rigged vessel with fake lions aboard,
tanning themselves,
rearranging their lives,
shopping at Orchard Road. Hip clever deconstructors would
propose: Was it not
an experiment in separation?

The mother
plays her apron strings but they're trapped in the piano.

Her son
caresses the keys to the box.

They steer close to the point of remembering
but all they hear is goddamn Bach.

You have to remember: It's
a goddamn experiment.
Once you've stowed away, sailors say, you'll feel fonder
for home. Ports of call as distant as that time
a stranger's touch reminded you
of your mum's. That same fondness for empty shells
and deserted beaches
and
lifeless bodies in your bunk.

The experiment consumes all.

2.

I will miss you even before you go.
Your words knock on my ears but nobody's home.
I see you but you're a mirage.
Hungry as a lion but I can't eat you.
Only here with you does absence mean anything to me.
Only here, islanded, your body as blind as a turned off TV, do I feel as
though
I possess nothing.

3.

What unholy alliances must be accounted for
when you've been in love with one god too long?
You go online to solicit visitations of cock.

"Is your user ID the Holy Ghost?
I'm the Son and my Father wants a Trinity."

There is no Satan, only the Satan within
ourselves. There is no blasphemy, only
the obscenity of monogamy.


"We're all gods here. What's there
to be ashamed of?"

You know nothing about me and
you don't care because that's exactly
what you're looking for. Vice versa. Perfection.

"We'll live for the moment.
We'll leave immortality to the mortals."

4.

I used to be cute before I got clever.
I'm not jaded.
I just stay at home and listen to CDs all day.
It's better than going out and having to endure my own idiocy
mirrored by the idiocy of others.
Sometimes I wish reality was more conscientious of policing
its tolerance levels for foolishness.
Yet, being the clever bunny that I am, I know I must confront stupidity.
I must question its existence.
Why does stupidity exist despite our efforts to understand it?
(Is it just me or do I sound moronic just now?
I should be more vigilant.)
God, if you really exist, why must you burden me with such inanity?
Why must I suffer accepting
being only what I am with no shot
at elucidating enlightenment to those bigger questions?
Constantly looking in mirrors, checking out the size of my brain.
Why is it that all the really cute people have no idea
that they're cute?
Why are they so stupid?

5.

The actors sit on an upright piano,
white towels around their waist.
The older actor recounts his youth
to the younger actor.
In character, the latter dismisses the former's attempts
to converse with him.
The audience is quiet and attentive, focused
on the sexual tension between the two of them.
The older man, humbled by time.
The younger, muscular and arrogant.
How will this bathhouse encounter end?

Suddenly I think of an older actor
who once recounted his past to me
in a moment of indiscretion.
There was a piano in the room
but we didn't sit on it.
He spoke of how he was once
an angry young man.
I looked into his eyes, which were
beautiful if only to me,
and thought of how one could only offer the past
which was when I arrived at the conclusion there was no future in a moment.

6.

Every fantasy, like Singapore, exists in a bubble
and every boy who has ever had a fantasy
runs around with a needle.

7.

What if River Phoenix and Keanu Reeves
fell in love and left
Hollywood far, far behind?
It would've made for a nice sequel
but a hard sell.
Nobody likes a naïve gay romance
that doesn't end in buttered tragedy,
especially those queens brought up on
a diet of Judy and Liza.

What if they hid in Singapore,
eating overpriced noodles
looking at the Merlion,
posing for passing tourists?
Two drifters looking for rainbows.
Along the way, they would sell their bodies
and enunciate like valley girls.
Would they know what's real anymore?

8.

Why do I feel so sad watching this play
when I should be feeling happy?

Is it because the gay character killed himself
after years tormenting himself with the shame
of having his sexuality discovered
so publicly?

Or is it because the "widow', his ex-colleague,
who once had a crush on him,
could not bring herself to
read him the letter
she wrote to him
on the night he killed himself?

Or, maybe, is it because,
in a deeply dissatisfying way,
I felt utterly helped-less watching how every
one of these boys
(and girls) had weights attached to their
ankles and pushed into the harbour,
with the spectres of intelligence and wisdom
looking on so self-satisfied?

Or, or, maybe because it is all so true,
every single word and gesture
mirrored and repeating
the only happiness in being gay
is the deliverance?

(This little island exhausts me.
I must get away.)

 View on a single page

User Comments

posted by Dr Aziz
Greetings,

I am rusty on the writing thing...

Ah well, 'reply' lah ooi...

Baru best

 

posted by Just a reader
Good work in standing up in defence to homosexuals...But I would like to pose a question here...Why is it that gays being so self-defensive? Nobody is bashing them, if you are a GAY, say so...GET OUT OF your closet...Stop being defensive and indulge in self sympathy...Nobody is making life difficult for homosexuals...It's through insecurities deep down within those who are unsure of themselves that make life difficult for themselves. I have to put an end to my statement. And please Pang, aren't you tired of posting articles on alternative lifestyles just so that you could do your part in rattling the cage...

 

posted by Lelaki
I just don't get it. If there are gay individuals who are Out and Proud, you will probably condemn them for being decadent, corrupt and what have you. Look, you even question Pang for posting articles on the so called alternative lifestyle when I don’t really see many of these types of articles being posted in the first place. Why do you feel like this in the first place? I really wonder why.

What is your real motive to accuse gays of being “so self-defensive?” Why in the world would anybody be so supercilious as to lump gays into one group of people that are analogous to one another? This is like saying Indians are drunkards, Malays are lazy and the list goes on and on.

Believe it or not, gays are made up of people from different ethnic background, education and social level. Stop ghettoizing gays.

 

posted by farelw@hotmail.com
i am gay...so, there..

 

posted by lupe
This site is funnn... :) Gado-gado... But everbody ade point memasing...

 

posted by Shoko Asahara
Ello,

Mmmm...

So, lelaki , where is your verse reply ?


I am still waiting...

1...

2...

3...


Bye

 

posted by pang
I doubt if your usage of the term Lelaki Lembut would be very endearing to any man you are referring to in your response, gay or otherwise. Unless of course you mean to address only effeminate men, including those who are heterosexual, in which case it begs the question: Why are you marginalising butch men? You like your boys soft?

You said that gay men need not be defensive since "Nobody is bashing them." Which solar system are you orbiting at moment? Do you read the papers or watch the TV? Lots of people in media and other positions of advantage are fond of disparaging folks just because they are lembut, or gay, or prefer to eat four-angled beans. And it just happens that people in the arts are fond of championing the individual for his/her difference. It's one of the ongoing tension that keeps us going.

While it is true that the insecurities of many gay men lead them to perceive a sense of persecution even if there aren't any real persecution, this psychological complex comes firstly from having been bred in an environment that has actively or insidiously made such individuals to feel wary for their safety, just for being who they are. On the other hand, you could say that the difficulties of life for people who don't fall into accepted social norms are a result of people who call themselves normal being insecure of their position and being unable to deal with diversity, or anything that challenges their superficial sense of masculinity.

It is good that you believe people should be empowered, and get out of the closet. But there is a reason why this is a thorny process for many. Have you asked yourself if you are making it easy for your friends to come out to you? I am glad for you if you are. But if you aren't, maybe you could start by being a little more willing to listen to their stories first instead of telling what they should do.

The enlightened ones never rattle the cage just for themselves. Lots of good folks speak out for friends and other people who find it difficult to speak out.

Cheers.

 

posted by Pawn
Greetings,

Mr Pang has written something touching. He is fighting a cause for equality and acceptance.

But the issue that he is hightlighting is not worth it. Why ?

Sexual preference is not a worthy cause to bicker or waste time discussing.

There are other more important issues in our life worth the while to fight for (or be expressed in Art).

What about racial prejudice ? What about 'Nationalism' ? What about equal opportunities for education ?

What about morality in art ?

Has art become too selfish to promote good and 'NATURAL' human values ?

So, it is Mr Pang's right to misuse this art website for personal reasons but it is our right to have a say about it.


And so; some 'special' men may wonder;

" Why can't I get it properly together? "


Peace

 

posted by Pawn
Greetings,

Mr Pang has written something touching. He is fighting a cause for equality and acceptance.

But the issue that he is hightlighting is not worth it. Why ?

Sexual preference is not a worthy cause to bicker or waste time discussing.

There are other more important issues in our life worth the while to fight for (or be expressed in Art).

What about racial prejudice ? What about 'Nationalism' ? What about equal opportunities for education ?

What about morality in art ?

Has art become too selfish to promote good and 'NATURAL' human values ?

So, it is Mr Pang's right to misuse this art website for personal reasons but it is our right to have a say about it.


And so; some 'special' men may wonder;

" Why can't I get it properly together? "


Peace

 

posted by Sodom Hussein
To the homophobes, please stop intellectualising your sexual prejudices. If the thought of two men or two women having sex with each other disgusts you, then just say it. It's not like no one's ever heard it before. If you are protective over the privileges offered by your heterosexuality, then name that too.

Enough of this "there are other problems worth highlighting" crap. You end up sounding like a chauvinist Malaysian Malay/Muslim politician/poser. Sexual preference is an individual choice. The State should not regulate it. And if you think it's a sin or that it's disgusting then it's your right. But it's also the right of those who think there is nothing wrong with it to express their opinions and defend them, just as you have a right to defend yours.

It's called freedom of expression. But if you're a parochial little git, then I forgive you for not being familiar with the concept.

 

posted by Susan Chong
Why can't you people just admit it already! There is no need to beat around the bush. If you have a hate agenda, just be plain honest about it and say that you hate homosexuals. What is so damn difficult about it?

 

posted by Jack Meridew
Greetings,

Hmm...

Maybe the wind has blown up some queers' tight thongs...


But it was fun the less to provoke certain people ( for a good reason ? )

How rudeness can be so interesting to read at times...

And so,

We should do whatever we feel as right, as long as it is not perforating somebody's behind...

But to say that was rude too...


(election, election, election)


Ciao

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment