search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?



BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"Each of the arts whose office is to refine, purify, adorn, embellish and grace life is under the patronage of a muse, no god being found worthy to preside over them."

- Eliza Farnham
You are not logged in.
articles

 View on a single page

03. 10. 2002
A Rat’s Eyeview Of CATS by Antares

I have never been a great fan of Andrew Lloyd Webber and, having finally caught CATS at Istana Budaya, am still largely indifferent to the man’s work, despite his enormous worldwide commercial success (or perhaps it’s the snob in me that turns his nose up at cultural products churned out by heavy-duty hype and the corporate entertainment machine).

But I’ll grant that the musical sophistication Lloyd Webber - pardon me, The Lord Lloyd Webber - attained with this 1981 costumed extravaganza was, for me, a bit of an ear-opener. The overture itself was extremely adventurous and engaging, while the orchestrations in many places came close to sheer genius.

If anyone truly deserved a standing ovation, it was the invisible orchestra under the musical direction of Stefan Lombard, with Fanie Fouche on keyboard, Bruce Muirhead on bass guitar, and Jarrod Bayliss on percussion. I’d sit through the whole thing from start to finish just to savour the excellent dynamics they lent to the complex score.

Unfortunately, on the gala opening night, the singing did not satisfy as much as the musical accompaniment did – either because the concealed radio mikes weren’t sufficiently amplified, or perhaps the singers for the most part lacked that elusive substance called “star quality.” This isn’t to say the South African cast and crew weren’t entirely “professional” (even if a few of them happen to be recent initiates into showbiz as an industry): indeed they all did a great job, but at RM250 a hit, glitzy theatregoers expect that extra something.

In any case, I had difficulty catching the lyrics (mostly gleaned from a collection of feline doggerel penned by T.S. Eliot and published in 1939 as Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats). Without a copy of the libretto handy, I had to take a wild guess at the allegorical intent of the work, which seems to have its roots in Christian mysticism, what with its allusion to resurrection and rebirth in the “Heaviside Layer,” following upon ascension thereto by means of vertical takeoff devices resembling latter-day lightships or biblical chariots of fire.

It’s fairly revealing that the spiritual head of the Jellicle Cat Cult is named Old Deuteronomy and serves as some species of messianic figure (never mind if his costume made him look like a bleached wookie, Marcus Desando’s deep baritone was convincing enough). Could it be that – just as the hit musical Nunsense was probably sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church to lure wayward sheep back to the fold – CATS was really a covert arts project of the Church of England?

Stands to reason: Eliot was an Anglican convert (with a memorial all to himself in Poet’s Corner at Westminster Abbey) and The Lord Lloyd Webber is undoubtedly a pillar of English high society (perhaps even on first-name terms with the Archbishop of Canterbury) whose prolific efforts in musical theatre earned him a knighthood, and then a peership - hence the oh-so-pompous title, bringing to mind the equally illustrious Toad of Toad Hall (speaking of whom, I wonder if anyone has ever staged Kenneth Grahame’s classic, Wind in the Willows, as a musical; now THAT would be something to relish, and I’d be tempted to audition for the role of Rat, of course).

Apart from the lacklustre singing, the choreography reconstructed by Jo-Anne Robinson from Gillian Lynne’s original West End version was a wee bit pedestrian. The dancing was superb, but the moves seemed more balletic, occasionally burlesque, than feline. A theatre friend who has twice seen the London production confirmed my suspicion that the choreography this time around didn’t quite match the original.

The fact that the West End production of CATS was directed by the phenomenal Trevor Nunn would have added an indefinable magic to the original staging, which also benefited from the creative input of production designer extraordinaire, John Napier, whose imaginative costume and set designs were more or less adhered to, but with a few inevitable compromises tailored for a touring ensemble.

IMG’s first full-scale musical spectacular at Istana Budaya was Fame – and I thoroughly enjoyed that. Fame boasted an Australian cast and I still recall the electrifying energy they brought to the stage. It would appear that South African stagecraft, though a serious contender, has still some way to travel before it can describe itself as “world class.” This isn’t a criticism, merely an observation. Not too long ago, they were still talking about “cultural cringe” Down Under, but not any more. It seems risky to jump to hasty conclusions on the basis of a single production, but then again, Fame was by far a more straightforward and less ambitious production.

The slower-paced, more mystical ambience of CATS – and the intricacy of its lyrical and musical content – places it in the category of a contemporary operatic work. And as any opera buff can testify, it’s the music, singing, and movement that counts, not the acting or storyline. Whilst the elaborate costumes and makeup were a feast for the eyes (though some of it didn’t look that catlike to me), they also had the unfortunate effect of obscuring the performers’ faces, so that it was difficult to relate to them either as felines or humans. In short, I didn’t really connect with the proceedings on stage – even when members of the cast took to sidling along the aisles, purring and demanding to be stroked.

Indeed, rarely have I felt so unmoved at the end of what ought to have been a spectacularly entertaining and even uplifting aural and visual bonanza. True, the gala night audience applauded dutifully at all the right moments, but none of it seemed particularly enthusiastic or spontaneous. Even the standing ovation seemed somehow obligatory on account of the bigwigs involved in bringing CATS to KL. The panting, sweating performers appeared to be taken by surprise by this gesture and drew a great deal of encouragement from it, which they fully deserved.

Perhaps the lack of real oomph at the Malaysian premiere of CATS was due to the extremely well-decked-out binder-dundat crowd - the cream of KL high society, no less - who by nature are conditioned to avoid public displays of enthusiasm and spontaneity (especially on Saturday nights). But in the interest of everyone who has invested in a ticket or two (by no means an ordinary theatre outing at these prices) I hope the production picks up in verve and vitality from hereon.

 View on a single page

User Comments

posted by Callista
I read in The Star today that they had a workshop. How come I didn't know about it? Was it open to the public or only students from those colleges mentioned? They also said there was a workshop when Fame came as well. Would have LOVED to participate in them.

 

posted by Vuvie
I saw Cats in Istana Budaya. I want to say that from my limited exposure to musicals, it was pretty good. Though the movement was slightly out of sync, there were still good darting between the audience. Makes me feel like being an audience is my role. Rum Tum Tugger should be taller and skinnier. Railway cat's additional siamese scene was fresh but a tad too long and flat. The crowd though was bland. I believe I am the only person in grafitti pants and without pashmina shawl. My brother was gathering wierd looks with his traditional chinese shirt. What a boooring crowd!
I saw Fame in the Kallang Theatre. Now that is the most 2D musical I have ever seen. I was dozing at the second half. Their dancing was messy and they were emotionless delivering their lines. BUT the crowd was really cool. They were relaxed and none of that up-tight farts in green coats flashing at your camera. I think the ambience killed Cats.
Saving grace?
The t-shirt glows in the dark...

 

posted by Celeste Theunissen
I also heard that there was a workshop for Cats-now why do only certain people in Malysia get to know about it and not everybody? Am I not sucking up to the right people or is it because I am not Malyasian? Anyway-you can keep your workshop because I am a ex-South African dancer and I will be having lunch with the cast-I have finally sucked up to the right people-The South African High Commission.

 

posted by Ari
This got to be the worst theater or for that matter, musical ive ever been too. I live in New York for 7 years and my apartment is just a few block away from Broadway and i have watch lots of musical and theater but i never had chance to watch this feline stupidity there. So when i heard its coming to malaysia, i decide to watch it. I had the best sit, 5th row from the stage but guess what, i slept halfway thru the show. I mean, theres no story in the show. Its just a bunch of lunatic human, dressing like cats, and try to imitate monkeys. Go to the show only if the ticket is free

 

posted by Lew Marsh
I caught CATS last night courtesy of someone who was working on the show. I left unmoved and just feeling blah about the whole thing. I have watched a few musiclas, been in some and also have recordings of many others but CATS was a let down.

This is what i didn't like about the show
The dancing was not up to par, OLD DEUTERONOMY wasn't OLD, he was a young man in a tattered coat and it came across that way. (A good actor would have played the part right and not given his real age away), the pas de deux between Mungojerrie and Rumpleteaser was not in sync. and a couple of the lesser soloists falied to impress me with their voices.

And the Malaysian audience - well it is quite obvious that we are starved for shows as almost everyone gave them a standing ovation, could it be that the cast waited longer on stage during their curtain call cos they were expecting people to stand -or subtly "encouraging" people to stand?? Being appreciative of soemthing is a good thing but why only when MAT SALLEH's come to town to people stand up? Sometimes when it wasn't even deserving. When locals do the same they do they show the same appreciation?

Things i liked.. The rest of the leads and ensemble were good, no complaints there, each of them did justice to their roles. CHORUS work was good, harmonies and the like were very pleasing on the ear. I must say that Cameron Mackintosh was clever in his choice of technical and creative people. Without the set and lighting the show would have been much worse than it was. The sound system and the microphones etc were excellent. People only mention the sound system when it goes awry, but here i'm saying WELL DONE.

It only goes to show, how a simple product, packaged and marketed well can be a hit ... for over 20 years and more.

The songs were OK, nothing spectacular and well, I still prefer Jesus Christ Superstar, Phantom and Sunset Boulevard. Those were much better.

It's sad that the public had to pay RM 130 - RM 250 for seats for this show. If Les Miserables or The Lion King were brought in at those prices, yes they would be worth it.

Also, I think it's time more MALAYSIANS were working backstage and onstage in such musicals, as there's no point sponsoring so much money and most of the revenue is taken away when we should be promoting the growth of our local talents and technical people. Singapore has learned their lesson. SO should we before it's too late.

 

posted by joker
"I think it's time more MALAYSIANS were working backstage and onstage in such musicals"

Imagine one day ...Bell in Beauty and the Beast, Jean Valjean, Javert, Fantine, Chain Gang in Les Miserables, Christine in Phantom of the Opera are all MALAYSIAN CAST!! What a disgusting production!!!
i'm sure you don't want to see Malay girl as Eva Peron(Evita) or Chinese-Jesus theSuperStar..hahaha...
I know i'm being so bitchzzy...but let's face it we want to see (more convienced) Mat Salleh in this type of western musical..right?

but it's okay for malaysian as animal in the cast of Cats or The Lion King..

 

posted by Lew Marsh
Dear Joker,
If you did not know, performers of African/Ethnic heritage have played parts usually played by Caucasians in many musicals. Nancy in Oliver, Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard, Mdm Thenardier in Les Mis, and many more.

When you have a musical which revolves around racial lines like MISS SAIGON and THE KING AND I, then you definitely need to have Asian Roles played by Asians and Caucasian roles played by Caucasians. But in musicals like LES MIS and PHANTOM, you know already that the characters are supposed to be FRENCH so it does not make a difference when non caucasians play roles in the show. Japan and Singapore have succeeded in producing WESTERN and LOCAL originial musicals with the talents they have. KOREA and the PHILLIPINES also are quite advanced with their musicals, original ones at that too. When CATS played in Singapore, Grizabella was played by a Singaporean. Was it a marketing gimmick or policy to have locals onstage? I don't know but it was a good thing. When Les Mis played there, they used children who were already in Singapore for certain roles too.

However if we NEVER ever consider seeing our locals in musicals which are brought in, then we are letting the world know that Malaysia has NO talents for the stage.

Singapore has staged INTO THE WOODS and THEY'RE PLAYING OUR SONG with Lea Salonga and other Singaporean and American Asian performers to great success and acclaim. The mix of artists ensures that locals have a platform to grow and develop their talents.

Even in the Corporate world we see this happening. You get one or 2 Engineers or people who are experts in their field and you train locals.

In the long run, if we see RM 4- 5 million of our hard earned rinngit being siphoned off instead of being re-injected into our local economy, what is it doing for our cash flows and the value of our ringgit? Some has to come back to us. And do you honestly want to pay RM 250 for EVERY musical that comes to KL? That's ridiculous.

I'm now knocking foreign productions, I'm saying that at least give locals a chance to audition, or provide more workshops for people with talent and not just a SELECT few, chosen by the powers that be who think they know better.

But yes, in musicals like CATS, JOSEPH AND THE AMAZING TECHNICOLOUR DREAMCOAT, STARLIGHT EXPRESS and JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR, more people of asian and other ethnic origins have been casted.

At the end of the day, the more experienced and talented people there are to work onstage and behind the scenes in musicals, the more chances of original work being produced. And quality ones at that. Now that would be a great step forward in the progress of our local performing arts scene.

 

posted by V
Count me in!

 

posted by Maverick
Dear Lew (what a cool name),

I have to say that you are sharply spot-on about encouraging local presence in Malaysian theatre. And I had to say 'presence' instead of talent only because we still retain a grotesquely overwhelming 'sense' (nothing to do with sensibility) of Malaysian pride. Why is it that no one wants to do 'backstage-ing'? It need not be mentioned that that means we are far from being remotely 'cultured' at all (guess why it was mentioned).

On the other hand, I have to agree with Ms Theunissen as well. Malaysian media, journalists and the rest of this part of the populace who pride themselves for being in the loop (or Said to be) are simply far from resourceful (which should be their main gift). Kids like me were brought up listening to the Real World Nugget of Truths like having to 'know the Right People', establish 'connections', etc. I can see why it is so much a part of Malaysian 'culture' now.

But even if we get to know everything there is to know at the push of a button (make sure it isn't fatally vandalized, wrongly labeled or permanently designed for optic disc (blind spot) visibility), we are rarely encouraged to appreciate the dignity (I can hear someone say, 'Hah?') of Art in this country. I'd been in school dramas before, so I try not to join in the bickering about hefty ticket prices as they are usually associated with a lot of sweat and blood on the part of the production crew, even though I'm this typical manifestation of a broke student. I think I know a little of what it's like to woo Art and court the theatre.

I think that we have to be reminded about the kind of society in which we are bred. At least 95% of us out here do not know what it is like to look at the big picture from where you are standing. We don't know the euphoria of executing a divine gesture on stage about which no one in the audience have a clue. We don't see how the (seemingly) simple act of telling a story can be related to nobility, insight, foresight, blunt or deep aesthetics, divine revelations or an invaluably edifying walking stick with which we attempt the struggles and battle of another day. The very beacon of hope.

I know a lot of people in my own family who will go and watch 'Cats' only because that is what rich people in society do. Go to the theatres, appear extravagantly attired and be seen in public when you're not generating cash for the sake of it. Literature in English for SPM was a joke (Mr Joker wouldn't think so, for certain).

People who are in the position to make a difference, such as you, our Lanky Lew (saw you in 'A Slice of Saturday Night', the epitomy of all that is of 'lank' - constume accentuated that, I'm sure), should just slap people around for a bit. Of course writing in to sites like these is a good start (bells ringing?).

 

posted by jaycee
I think some of the comments/critics here on Cats are too harsh and unfair.. Granted, the performance of the S.African cast lack lustre in terms of vocals and dance and overall performance..although i found the setting, sound and light system commendable. But to shoot down Cats as a musical is something i have to defend.

I have watched Cats a total of three times - twice in London's Westend and once recently here. I must say Cats is still one of my favourite musicals ever. I've watched no less than 10 major musicals and i enjoyed them tremendously. Yes, Cats is different and uncoventional, as it does not have a proper plot and story line -very different from the others such as Les Miserables and Miss Saigon.

But what is a musical? While the story of musical can be a selling point, it is NOT like a movie or a play.. a person who judge a musical discounting its aesthetic brilliance - its songs, dance choreography is simply narrow minded. Cats surely not lack any of this...

Cats contains that magical elements of an exciting fable. Woe to a mocker that said it is just a bunch of lunatics trying to be cats. Then what about The Lion King and all the fairy tales that are so loved by children and adults over the ages? Should be let our imagination and fantasy be stifled in the realm of arts?

Cats has many magical moments - and climaxes when Grazibella went to the Heaviside Layer.. It has some of the most stunning dance steps found in musicals.. and there are great songs too. Memory aside..I love Jellicle Songs for Jellicle Cats, The Addressing of Cats and some of the upbeat numbers..

After all, if Cats is crap or `s..t' like some of you implied, could it be the longest running musical in both side of the Atlantic? Think again.. and broaden your Musical tastes.

 

posted by Callista
Lew,

Make sure you make your auditions public the next time you're casting for something alright? Seems to me that most casting calls are internal ie. only people in the know, would know. However will you people get new bloods then?

 

posted by jbb Lim
Lew,
Anyw idea is there anymore such musicals coming around Malaysia? Thanks

 

posted by Lew Marsh
1. Callista - If I was holding auditions or anything, you would know about this. sometimes certain shows don't audition people cos 4 people get together and say, "Let's do this show, and we need another and I know this person who would be great for the part." If it's a small show it sometimes is easier to just ask around and cast that way than to prepare press releases, make sure they go out, then organise the audition, make sure there is someone to take calls etc. Then there is actually Conducting the audition. So sometimes open auditions are not the way. On the other hand there is what we call CLOSED AUDITIONS or AUDITIONS by INVITATION. This is where we invite a few people we know to read a part or sing a song. Then we decide.

Usually open auditions are posted in the papers and on websites (tho i think some people have decided to use the section for SELF PROMOTION ... hmmm). Notices are also up at certain theatres and arts related venues.

2. Jaycee - This is a place where people voice their views. And we respect yours as much as you should respect ours. The points made by some of us was -(i) why should we pay so much for a hyped up production that was NOT as great as it was. I wondered to myself what was it that got CATS running for 21 years. But fact is, it's one of those musicals where you either LIKE IT or NOT. I think people who appreciate SONDHEIM and the ASHMAN/MENKEN might not like LLOYD WEBBER as much. As I said there are only a couple of his shows which I really like.
(ii) When are locals going to be given the chance to learn the ropes, on stage and back stage? Some kind of equity type ruling should be implemented. If you think about it if there were no 'rules'/guidelines as such, our local companies, sports teams. TV commercials etc would be over run with people from other nations. (if some companies had their way)

3. As for new shows, you have to ask IMG what they have planned but I think they have struck a deal to bring in 2 musicals a year. How good is that? I dunno. But all I can say is check out ASPECTS OF BROADWAY. You'll know what I'm talking about.

 

posted by Someone Ya'll dont know
As for all of you it is nice that you all decide to put your comments in but you have all been quite mean about the whole thing. just like the people complaining about the seats! the play has nothing to do with your seats and you payed to sit in them so get over it. And for second you all have NO clue how hard it is to get up in front of a bunch of people and try and please people like you! no im not an actor for broadway but still it is nerverecking when you get up an do your bet and thats what you people have to say. if you ask me you are all to rude and critical!

 

posted by Kris
I understand that some of you are displeaded with your seats, and that some couldn't follow the plot - but honestly. The plot isn't drawn out in black and white like they are in Childern books's. You must listen to the lyrics to understand it - go off of their emotions and the like. I never seen Cats in Malaysia, nor have I ever been there. When I saw it though it was something heartwrenching and moving. Perhaps you went in with a preconsummed idea and were diassapointed, try watching it again, or just listeining the the music. Give it another chance.

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment