search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?



BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"Genuine spirituality, like art, is open and dynamic...both are the hope of a world so badly in need of transformation."

- Veronica Brady
You are not logged in.
articles

 View on a single page

18. 11. 2004
Supermarket Theatre by Pia Zain

My late father was a strong supporter of the arts, and my family heritage has always included some interaction with the creative space. I should probably state upfront that I feel passionately about arts and culture, and creative expression. I should also tell you that I was a theatre producer, and co-founded DramaLab, and so anything I say will be subjective to the extreme.

English language theatre in Malaysia seems to be pretty vibrant – there is always something on, and you can see a new play every week if you want to. But it seems something is missing. There is an element of self-indulgence in some of the theatre that I have seen recently that borders on the narcissistic. Sumunda’s presentation of Five Letters from an Eastern Empire springs to mind. I found it difficult to be engaged because there was no theatre happening – no exposure of truth, or grappling with internal issues, no character growth or storyline. There was no acting, only a recital of words that had no meaning or resonance. A friend of mine said that it could be reviewed in a single sentence, “Dear Mother and Father, I wrote the third letter and have killed myself and thus saved the audience from any more pain.”

I recently spoke to Krishen Jit, who is in rehearsal with Zahim Albakri, on two one-act, one man plays by Huzir Sulaiman (Notes on Life and Love and Painting + The Smell of Language). He believes that a certain complacency has settled over the arts scene in recent years. He talks of a culture of “supermarket theatre” where arts practitioners try to tempt audiences with performances that will make them laugh or smile, but will not provoke them, or bring out those truths that make us recognise our shared humanity.

What’s happening here? In part, I think theatre in Malaysia has responded to the socio-political climate out there in the big world. Everything is moving towards the right, but in such a way that “if you are not with us, you are against us.” You cannot challenge because the line in the sand is so complete. It is all or nothing, and we, sadly, seem to have come up with nothing. The audience is looking for a happy pill. Something pretty, well designed, may be a little edgy so that they can feel that they have been anarchistic, but there’s nothing really too challenging or scary or moving or difficult. The audience is guilty of a certain narcissism too. And because they are paying, and we depend quite often on a good box office, we have given them what they want.

Our government has not helped. In the past few years, we have seen a movement towards silencing our freedom of expression on the most ridiculous grounds. And while the arts community has at times responded and challenged this conservatism, it seems that we are also self-censoring more than ever now. We revive old works that we know the audience responds to, and we add in flashing lights, and put up great big screens with incomprehensible and unrelated images flashing in the background to make it feel ‘arty’.

And to be honest, the arts criticism I have read in the papers is not really… stimulating. It feels like some soft white bread, fluffy, white, bland, and filled with shit, not nutrients. We are all partly guilty for bringing our arts scene to the point that reading reviews is no longer a challenge but a smooth susu pekat manis moment of sickly sweetness.

It’s strange that at a time when Kuala Lumpur is trying to be an international city, and find recognition as a cosmopolitan, sophisticated urban metropolis, DBKL hampers artistic expression and ties us up in knots with licenses and legalities. And yet rather then creating art in a parking lot, and saying fuck it, we turn around and start performing in corporate gigs, and become the useful idiots of a system that wants us around, and yet doesn’t want us to say what we should say, or contest where we need to contest, or talk about those things that make us uncomfortable and break out in a cold sweat at 2 am.

I hope this will change. The new Minister of Arts and Culture has encouraged me to believe that there will be a new approach to enabling artistic expression in this country. He is proactive in his support of the arts, and there is a feeling of a fresh clean wind, like after the heavy rains of the monsoon, sweeping through our country. This is all good, and I am glad I am going to be here for a while to see what happens.

I hope in all of this that there will be more support of the arts, resources, financially, physically, spiritually, mentally. I hope that we challenge each other to find those elements of honesty that allow us to tell the stories of our place and our space with pain and laughter and light. We are a nation that sits around at mamak stalls late into the night, and tells each other stories about hantu, corruption, true love, politics, angry drivers, waves of change. And all that in one sentence sometimes! We celebrate our difference, and fight about it. We have a sense of humour and we find our truths by exposing all our inconsistencies and irritations to one another.

There are times when I have sat in a darkened theatre, and been overwhelmed by the honesty that has been created. It transcends my daily experience and fills me with memory, longing, recognition. Art happens in a space between the audience and the performer, where a shared experience can, for a moment, create clarity and beauty.

In all of this, we need to continue to go to see theatre, and other works of art and culture. We need to support those who are brave enough to try to present truthfulness, and we need to confront those who are taking our money and running with it. We need to encourage our friends, lovers, family, enemies to come and watch and be a part of the making of culture, because culture belies the popular consciousness, and it does influence how a society works, views itself, operates, loves, destroys, lives.

And back to Krishen, Zahim and Huzir who are presenting Notes On Life & Love & Painting + The Smell Of Language at Actor’s Studio, Bangsar this week. Notes is a play that received fantastic reviews but had very low audience turn out the first time it was performed (five years ago). This is a shame because it’s a work that speaks to the life of an artist, and gives us an insight into why artists are there in the first place. The Smell of Language on the other hand is a piece that is political and familial at the same time, and exposes our fears about the consequences of saying what we need to say. Both are challenging pieces that won’t necessarily ensure a comfort level that some of us have gotten used to, but will hopefully raise the temperature a little bit in our small corner of the world. I hope you go and see this – or anything else that catches your fancy that might be a little bit different. Krishen and Zahim are both dearly beloved friends of mine, so I cannot review their work – if I tell you how wonderful they are, would you believe me? You would recognise that I experience them through my love of them, and thus be sceptical of my viewpoint. What I hope you will do, is go and see this production, and use this space, or any other you can find, to talk about and share your experience of this work of art. It’s a part of the dialogue that happens that makes art important in our lives, and that can change the way we make art, and thus the way we live.

~ ~ ~

Pia Zain was a co-founder of Dramalab. She is in the process of starting a company HegZain, a project development company. She hopes to be involved in the arts scene soon, so she can put her money where her mouth is.

 View on a single page

User Comments

posted by mia
I agree with Pia Zain. Sometimes when I attend a theater production in Malaysia especially those produced by Actors Studio, I always come out feeling like I've been ripped off. The productions are cheap and the contents are ususlly just not theater material. They are more like TV sitcoms. Whilst watching, my mind would keep saying "I should have just stayed home and switch on the tele. It's just the same." Sad isn't it? I then just then stopped going. Sometimes producers in Malaysia miss the main point of going to the theaters. Its the experience, the feel. I was a big theater goer during my six years in England. Their productions are excellent. Not necessarily with a big budget, some with only two actors. But their lines the way they recite them-WOW. Thumbs up though to Istana Budaya. Thanks for allowing Malaysian to demonstate their artistic values. Local productions, I must say, have improved there. Some very artistic and different. Looking forward to go to any of Pia Zain's production. You seem to understand our needs. Keep us posted PLEASE. We are hungry for a good production. Just make sure its nothing like Actors Studio.

 

posted by al-mustaqeem
terkejut juga membaca rencana pia. saya tak pasti kalau ada penulis pernah mengkritik teater (berbahasa) inggeris dalam kakiseni. barangkali ada dan saya tidak pernah perasan. saya sentiasa ucapkan syabas kepada siapa saja yang berani melihat ke dalam diri.

bagaimanapun, pia.. akhir2 ini, sering saya dengar orang menggantung harap pada menteri, khusus pada menteri kebudayaan yang baru. antaranya dari mulut Adman Salleh dalam satu forum yang Kathy antara ahli panelnya. harapan sebegini, pada saya, tidak lain akan menyebabkan kita jadi orang terlaknat. kerana, suatu yang nadir, amat jarang berlaku, untuk orang politik jujur pada seni. menteri yang kita gantungkan harap itu subuh2 akan membungkus peralatan pejabatnya jika dipanggil ke kementerian lebih kanan (kem. kewangan, misalnya).

saya merasa lebih aman menyandarkan harapan pada pia sendiri, yang telah berjanji untuk "melebur" wangnya dalam sebuah produksi teater. saya menganjurkan berontak terus dan percaya diri.

 

posted by 2 cents
You said "We need to encourage our friends, lovers, family, enemies to come and watch and be a part of the making of culture, because culture belies the popular consciousness, and it does influence how a society works, views itself, operates, loves, destroys, lives."

I won't say whether I agree or disagree with your statement, but without giving any sort of backing, be it in the form of statistical data, actual incidences, or even hypothetical situations, that statement gives the impression of an overly generalized one. You can of course choose to make a statement without backing it up, but I think it does nothing to strengthen your argument.

 

posted by Carmen
Kudos to Pia for saying it like it is. But in my view, part of the problem has to do with exactly what you say: we are not playing in parking lots.... so we play in Actor's Studio Bangsar, which costs a bomb... unless you make it to the preview, you have to fork out RM35 and up for a show... god forbid you be a student, then you have to still fork out RM25 and up. What happened to the days when students only paid RM10 or less?

When theatre is priced as such, it will attract a middle class audience who will expect the supermarket theatre Krishen speaks of. Those of us who do not want to fall into this "show me my money's worth" trap, will surely rue the day capitalism wove its way into the theatre scene.

Perhaps it is inevitable. Perhaps it is necessary. Perhaps it just what we choose not to grumble about because there are bigger fish to fry.

But as long as the ticket prices attract an audience who expects the same--i.e. little--English language theatre will only be preaching to a minority. Perhaps this is the goal: exclusivity breeds illusions of excellence.

I am not a good judge though, I will be frank. I don't really go the theatre anymore.

 

posted by Adam Anuar
Ticket prices aren't the issue. Companies like ICT and Comedy Court charge up to RM142 for a seat and their shows always sell-out because it's exactly the happy pill Pia talks about. Not that there's anything wrong with mindless entertainment, but where does that leave companies that try to make dramatic theatre? Is drama such a scary thing? Is it so inaccessible? Do people not want to think anymore, even a little bit? Or do they think dramatic theatre is just one giant wank? People complain that Malaysian theatre isn't as good as those imported musicals that cost at least RM250 a seat. Yet audiences aren't even attending shows that cost a fraction of that. RM25 for a two-hour live performance? Isn't that worth more? Discos charge up to RM50 a night just to get in and yet weekend after weekend, people go out and dance and drink and spend money. Is that better entertainment? Is that what Malaysian theatre has to become - a disco? I just wish that people who say they support the arts and freedom of expression and all that make more of an effort to show it. Sure, you don't have to go to every show. If it's rubbish, it's rubbish. But how will the people know, and for that matter how will theatre companies know, if the people don't try?

 

posted by Kurt Crocker
What a lame lament. Theatre is entertainment, pure and simple. People go to the theatre to be entertained through a variety of forms. Some get their kicks by political enlightenment, scarey truths, bold realities, and raw nerve. Fine. Others want simply to laugh, or cry. Also fine. Many like theatrical entertainment in all possible forms, including those that explore cultural discovery and daring socio-missions. Relevancy can exist on all levels of a theatrical experience, whether the take-out is a profound epiphany or pure whimsy. Lighten up, for crying out loud.

 

posted by adam
If things get any lighter, theatre in KL is going to float away altogether.

 

posted by mia
On the spot, Adam. Agree with you totally. Any lighter and theater in Malaysia will float, float away. HELP

 

posted by Sink or Swim
sink.

 

posted by sink or swim
AFTER posting the above, I realized that it could be perceived in a certain way, that would be to nobody's benefit, but rather to the detriment of the interests of others.

I just want to say that in no way was the intention of my post to refer to, be it directly or indirectly, to any KL theatre event that had to do with water. I was just responding to the wittily inane posts above mine in a jestful manner, to counter them with a play on words, just as they had done.

However, any offense or distress that I may have caused to any party because of my remarks, I deeply apologize for my carelessness and my lack of foresight before hitting the button.

The editor may wish to delete my posts if he feels that I have transgressed, not because of my intentions but rather because of the nature of the words and the juxtaposition of syntax of them, and since the readers of this website, in my opinion, should have the right of claim against posts that they not cause them distress.

 

posted by Cat.
I for one welcome light-heartedness. There are popcorn movies and there are artsy movies. Why should there be not a form of variety in theatre as well? Categorization stifles movement.

 

posted by Christina
I am very interested to know what all the people giving comments are doing to improve theatre in Malaysia? Just as Kurt said, relevance can be found in any form of theatre, whether super serious or in fun. No matter what contrivance used, a director or producer has very little direct impact on an individual audience member's reaction to what you have put on stage. The audience will read into it what they will.
I say the success of theatre in Malaysia depends on the very equal partnership between the producers and the audience, and that sometimes a happy and successful union is struck, and sometimes it doesn't work. We might even consider viewing the growth of theatre in Malaysia in a more playful light, as if waiting to see what happens when the lights come up.
As a footnote, I am a theatre producer who is very well aware of the cost of producing theatre, and I would like to point out that Actors Studio is the cheapest theatre for hire in KL and provides excellent support in publicity, equipment, front of house and convenience. Plus audiences love the space and are very venue-loyal.

 

posted by 2 Cents
You are right to a point (in reference to your first sentence). I have the utmost respect for you since you are contributing to Malaysian theatre, and likewise to all theatre artists and workers.

However, the people giving the comments might not be the theatre folk per se, and I think that as a theatre artist, one should learn to take criticisms, especially if it's from outside the theatre circle. What's the point if criticism is ONLY from your co-workers? Sometimes, a view from a different angle does the trick. Furthermore, a critic, whether an armchair critic or a more seasoned one, IS (or at least COULD BE) contributing to the theatre scene simply by virtue of their criticisms.

Anyway, I agree more with your views, but try telling that to a theatre critic! Which is why this post is more as an exercise for me to try to see things from their perspective or at least from some distanced perspective, though I must admit that I can never escape from my bias.

There is no easy answer for anything, but we must try nonetheless.

 

posted by adam
i think the real question from all this is what do audiences want? if its supermarket theatre, then theatre companies should just give it to us and stop trying with all the drama. then maybe there'll be less complaining and everyone's happy. literally.

 

posted by Christina Orow
I have seen two productions recently which showcased the talents of two actors who gave great performances. Sad thing is, the theatre was half empty for most of both productions! I believe it was not a reflection of the production itself, but a reflection of our society's tastes. We can appreciate that the lack of attendance says something about what our potential audience wants, and for some reason, they did not want to watch these particular pieces.
I am all for constructive criticism but sometimes I feel there is a danger of over-thinking an issue to the point that we create a lot of white noise - why not just think of theatre as a form of expression where x or y put forth an idea, and maybe it is entertainment, maybe it is thought-provoking, or purely for a buck - if someone willingly pays to watch it, what's the big deal?
Theatre exists when there is a performance for an audience. Key word: audience.
I am by no means a thoughtful producer - I produce the same improv/comedy show a few times a year that regularly sells out, has big names, is fun and depending on your budget, can be pricey. But we reach an interesting demographic of people who may just be fans who might not even get the humour, to intellectuals who love the satire that sometimes comes up, to people who love seeing actors doing what they do best onstage.
We get non-theatregoers, and that to me is valuable, because they start talking about how much they enjoyed their theatre experience to other people who may think it is only for thinkers or rich people. I love having the actors onstage being appreciated for their craft - and am saddened when they are ignored, especially when their performances are stellar.
I say it is essential that the audiences are wooed with care into the theatre, and if it means "pandering" to common tastes to get it all started, I am all for it.

 

posted by Janny
What is indeed a "happy pill"? Some plays "theatre" in BM or English are funny-stupid and there are audiences for that. Some are funny-cynical-satirist and I really love them.

 

posted by patrick teoh
I went to see Zahim Albakri in the double bill last night. It was the best thing I've seen in theatre in recent months. Congratulations, Zahim. You're in a class of your own.

Those of you baargers making silly comments here should just go and buy tickets and see a show. If you like it then tell everybody else. If you don't then tell yourself or anybody else you want that it was,"Shit man what a stupid show. I'll never go to theatre again....." until the next time you see an ad or read a review that tickles your fancy then you decide if you want to take another chance lor. Simple isn't it? Waffor want to come here and say this and that forwat?

Actually ah, how many of the post-ers actually went to see something in theatre during the last 2 months ah?

 

posted by Patrick Teoh
He talks of a culture of “supermarket theatre” where arts practitioners try to tempt audiences with performances that will make them laugh or smile, but will not provoke them, or bring out those truths that make us recognise our shared humanity.

The above is extracted from Pia's article. I saw the performance last night. I laughed and smiled and had a damn good time. Nothing I saw or heard provoked or brought out those truths that make us recognise our shared humanity. In fact I don't think either of the plays had anything that could have done that. Very good entertainment none the less. So how ah, Krishen Jit? Did you shortchange me ah? Or have you become a partner in a supermarket chain somewhere? If you have, congratulations and well done. Proves that you are actually from this planet. One of us. Alright, man! By the way, that 2-for-1 promotion was worthy of praise man. TESCO couldn't have done it better.

 

posted by lennard
thank you mr teoh. what can i say - desperate times calls for desperate measures. watch out for the buy two, get to shag the producer free discount coming soon... that ought to sell three more tickets :)

 

posted by Antares
Huzir Sulaiman is a world-class playwright. Homegrown, Harvard-educated, now Singapore-based. How come ah?
Don't blame him - those kiasu flers down south seem to have got their act together when it comes to English-language theatre - in terms of adequate funding and a burgeoning middleclass audience that actually buys SEASON tickets.

Zahim Albakri - I'm so proud to have been on stage with de bugger way back in 1988 when he first returned to KL after studying drama in the UK. He's come so far since those days I wouldn't dare play his butler on stage (would have been an interesting comedic twist if Lennard Gui had whipped out a pistol and shot the "well-known interrpreter/essayist/novelist"
in the ass-tral - sudahlah! ;-)

Anyway... Zahim's performance in both plays was CONSUMMATE... MASTERFUL... SCINTILLATING...
too bad I don't get asked to write reviews anymore, so I won't gush more than this, don't get paid what.

THANKS, DRAMALAB, FOR DOING SUCH A DAMN FINE JOB - POOR ATTENDANCE IS A WHOLE DIFFERENT ISSUE I WON'T EVEN GET INTO. WHAT ARE MY CHANCES OF EVER RECEIVING A BIG FAT GRANT TO RELEASE ALL THE MUSIC AND WRITING ACCUMULATED IN MY RUSTY FILING CABINET??? ANY PROFESSIONAL HUSTLERS OUT THERE
WILLING TO HELP?

 

posted by 2 Cents
Wasn't Huzir a graduate of Princeton?

 

posted by Antares
Ooops.... Princeton produced our Huzir, you're absolutely right!
Thanks for the correction. But it might as well been Hahvahd, my dear! (If Huzir had gone to Yale he probably would have been recruited by the Agency and joined Skull & Bones like Dubya, Dubya's Dad, and John F. Kerry.)

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment