










15. 12. 2005
To Dye For by Dr Zakaria Ali
This talk is centred on three artists: Yeong Seak Ling, Dr. Mohamed Najib bin Ahmad Dawa, and Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak. Through different paths they have arrived at a singular attitude toward painting batik. I shall explore their obsession by delving into the question of why they do what they do, hoping to uncover possible meanings embedded in the set of imageries they have chosen.
For the batik painter, a mélange of geometrical and floral designs pretty much fills up the space. After adding a few characters, and a backdrop, the picture is done. These three artists have been at it for decades, urged by the idea that painting batik says a great deal about who they are. So enormous is this burden that they resort to release it by painting in a series.
Yeong Seak Ling: Protected it with heroic persistence
When an artist is thus committed, it means two things. One, the subject matter is inexhaustible, allowing for multiple treatments from a variety of viewpoints. Two, the subject matter has also created a clientele. These factors build the reputation of Yeong Seak Ling, for instance who has protected it with heroic persistence. Younger artists in Penang look up to him as one deeply committed to his art, to his particular way of making pictures. They recognise his highly distinguished technique of portraying the roughness of sand, or of dilapidated walls that seem literally textured. Or, the flushing motions of the pigeons’ wings that are so deftly executed that they defy gravity.
The same spirit to staggering details permeates the batik series, initiated by his need to celebrate this country. On the surface, this is none too surprising, because others celebrate it, too, by painting the Petronas towers, the Penang Bridge, the Minangkabau house, or the Putrajaya Mosque, sure emblems of Malaysian-ness.
For Yeong Seak Ling, however, his celebration is an affirmation he must make. Failing to do so would imperil his citizenship, a fear rooted in his Ipoh childhood. His mother died when he was three, whereupon his maternal grandmother raised him in Penang, away from his father, a fierce professional gambler whom he hardly knew, who had children with four other women. Yeong Seak Ling remembers the early hardships by the regular moving from one rented room to the next in Georgetown. The longest stretch was in the one above a coffee shop on Malay Street. Despite the name, the neighbourhood residents were mostly, if not all, Chinese. Insulated in the narrow back lanes, he was deprived of the opportunities to speak Malay, an inability that has never ceased to distress him. Subsequently, however, everyday reality crept in when he had to deal with people in the hospital, the police station, the land office, the immigration department, and the bus or train stations. And the limitations he endures cause much frustration.
His elder sister was banished to China during the Emergency, after which the family bore the stigma of having condone violence and bloodshed. His younger sister settled down in Canada, to start day one of a new life. Now left only with an elder brother whom he employs as a caretaker, Seak Ling would want no one to ever question his loyalty. He expresses his allegiance in the best way he knows how: by painting it in a set of many series. He starts off with the waterscape series, the tabletop series, the heritage series, the pigeon series, the beach series, the rock series, the old tree series, the rubber trees series (Plate 1), the kampung series (Plate 2), and the baby cot series (Plate 3). These images link him to the specificity of localities, to the very thing he wants others to know about the depths of his Malaysian roots in the earth that is Bukit Mertajam.
Dr. Mohamed Najib: Divine origins of human dignity
Initially a batik painter (Plate 4) with a superb sense of color, Dr. Mohamed Najib seeks his Malay roots to the mythical landmass called Langkasuka, the Dong Son drums, the Srivijayan sea ports, and the incantations of shamans. These are his points of reference when he paints batik designs, whose intricacies, he avers, are reflected in the woodcarving, the traditional dances, and the adat ceremonies, all of which have the curls and turns that are repeated and stylised and in his works, improved upon. Still, in painting batik he is going beyond the surface, into something highly esoteric. The meanings he has gathered are pretty private at the moment, but he would want to de-privatise them, bit by bit by articulating them in interviews and essays, hoping to win converts, and to open up minds. One in particular is the stylised bird image, the Inderawasih, found in the Dong Son repertoire dateable to at least the first century A.D. As the god of thunderbolt, Indera reincarnates in ancient Malay rulers and their abodes. Mahkota indera is the royal crown; Indera putera is the town of Pekan, in Pahang where Dr. Mohamed Najib is from; Indera sakti and Indera mulia are pre-Islamic capitals of Perak; royalty in Negeri Sembilan addresses one another as Indera mengindera, the most royal of the royals. The divine origins of human dignity are panca indera, the five senses.
As I indicated in the catalog, Dr. Mohamed Najid has quitted making batik due to health concerns. Even working in large open rooms with ample ventilations the wax fumes are no less hazardous. Adopting acrylic, Dr. Mohamed Najib has to learn literally from scratch, rarely moving away from the ready made colours sold in tubes. Their rawness delights him in one instance, disgusts, in another. Still, he aims for the colour’s intensity, in relations to other intensities: the deepest of the Vermilion Red with the deepest of the Emerald Green, side by side in contrast, in a parallel dance, long trotted in one corner, syncopated in another.
Acrylics provide him with the opportunity to use a series of dots with which to articulate the shapes of leaves, the lines of squares, the contents of rectangles, and the veins of feathers. Any of these that turn out bad he repaints them with a coat of opaque blues or orange. Curls, squares, triangles, petals, rosettes, shoots, stalks, and buds are repeated, stay in a cluster or lunge sideways or upwards. Such motifs are assured by the consistency of acrylics (Plate 5). The clarity of Dr. Mohamed Najib’s batik is somewhat unsettling because it is often heavy-handed, methodical, and premeditated. He admits feeling constrained handling the acrylics to achieve correctness, whereas using the canting he feels less so. Still he savours the spirit of chancy flow by having the “kepala kain” (Plate 6) a free run from one edge of the canvas to the other.
Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak: The Malay woman is salvageable
Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak capitalises on the batik worn by his model Nurkumalawati as a way of relating the ethos of budi bahasa Melayu, which he feels has been damaged by rapid urbanisation. The giggling Malay girls with their fancy hand phones he sees are but faint copies of the idealised Gadis Melayu he cherishes in his mind, one who is steep in idyllic setting, in rural tradition, in good manners, in God-fearing upbringing; one who has a deep respect for parents and elders, is family bound, and guilt-ridden. His paintings are a reminder that the Malay woman is salvageable.
Still, spurred by batik, Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak has been able to devote his time to doing portraits, as a source of income, with which to pay for food and rent. He is commissioned by tourists or friends, such as “Connie” (1996) (Plate 7). They either sit or supply him with photographs that he copies from. He ekes out a living by running a commercial gallery in the KOMTAR. Here in the deafening hustles in the heart of the Penang commercial world, he quietly gives art lessons, does occasional illustrations, and entertains customers. He tries his luck participating in competition, winning first prize the coveted “Mahsuri Price” of 30,000 ringgit in 1995. Earning a living with his art has never impeded his efforts to capture the elusive beauty of Nurkumalawati, in a series called “One Day in the Life of a Village Girl”. Out of the projected 40 works, he has finished 27. For this he has selected a sash of forty batiks for her to wear in a variety of scenes. A pencil sketch “Mak Tani” (2000) (Plate 8), followed by a series of oils “Bermain Congkak/Playing Congkak” (2000) (Plate 9), “Bunga Melati/ Jasmine” (2001), “Beradhah/Rest” (2001), “Bertefakur/Contemplation” (2001), “Mengukur Kelapa/ Rasping Coconut” (2002), “Berehat Atas Batu/Resting on the Rock” (2003) (Plate 10).
Facial likenesses are tied in with the individual batik patterns that call for a different kind of articulation. Flat, the design is straightforward; folded, it recedes, overlaps, and hidden, leaving colours and shapes disconnected. Yet, such challenges provide Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak his profoundest pleasures.
Three different paths converge at the juncture of self-recognition, reflected in the batik that is akin to a fractured mirror beckoning to be reassembled, piece by piece.
~ ~ ~
Dr. Zak is an associate professor at the School of Fine Art, University Sains Malaysia, Penang. He collects verbs, mixes Prussian Blue and Hooker's Green to get his black, and studies peoples' feet as they walk in the mosque on Fridays.
User Comments
| posted by Alber |
| I am totally appalled by the article by Dr. Zakaria Ali - that a Professor of Art and a Ph. D. at that - cannot differentiate the simple and fundamental distinction between a painter OF batik and a 'painter' USING the batik technique. The relationship between the two is totally superficial. Dr. Zakaria must work harder AND THINK harder to show any significant relationships between those two group of artists IF any exists beyond the most superficial one. At the risk of stating the obvious (after all it is not obvious to Dr. Zakaria) the relationship between those two groups of artists is parallel to the painter of coconut trees and a some kind of worker in the coconut industry - or - a painter of coconut trees and a craftsman using coconut leaves to construct some kind of design or other. In other words, there is no significant relationship between the two groups whatsoever.
|
| posted by Rumplestiltskin!!!
|
| From this article, Dr. Mohamed Najib bin Ahmad Dawa seems to me the only one of the three who really makes Batik painting. If Dr. Mohamed were merely a craftsman, I would imagine him preferring to work in the factory despites its health hazards and eventually ‘dying’(worst pun of the year) for his trade. If not this then, should he not give up batik making completely before considering something as untraditional and ‘foreign’ as acrylic on canvas for making batik? Fortunately, Dr. Mohamed seems to take batik as an open concept that can be reproduced and experimented upon regardless of the medium used. Now this is not to say dumping traditional materials like textile, dye, and stamps for a mixed media, video or on-line batik work instantly makes it interesting or relevant. Changing the medium without much consideration into reworking its symbolism leaves us with the kitschy works of Yeong Seak Ling and Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak. In both cases, batik is realistically captured but fails to trigger much fascination beyond its technical aspect. Batik is used here only as a minor symbolic detail amongst many. In the case of Yeong’s pieces, the craftman..er artist, painted batik together with traditional wood carving, picturesque landscape and country folks to produce works choked with nostalgia. So much so that it is difficult to believe this saccharine vision of Malaysia is real or ever existed. Nonetheless, I find it intriguing that the artist is driven to these ECMI (Easy Cheesy Malaysian Iconography) so that “no one ever questions his loyalty” while Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Razak uses ECMI to protect and project the ideal Malay female identity. If Batik is such a powerful marker of Malaysianess or Malayness, perhaps those wearing one will prevent us from being wrongly profiled by the police. What is different about Dr. Mohamed’s batik works is his interest in reinterpreting the internal working of the batik symbols. If I understand correctly what Dr. Zakaria says about the artist, then Dr. Mohd. is the only one here able to see beyond the formal beauty of the patterns and understands their rich mythical and ancient origins, reminding us that the geographical and historical richness of batik goes well beyond that of Malaysia. However understanding is only the first step. Guided by his personal logic and formal needs, Dr.Mohd redesigns old symbols and invents new ones while others dare not. The result to me, is a surrealism distinct from western types and Asian derivatives. While the meanings remains secret to artist, Dr. Zakaria states that the artist “would want to de-privatise them, bit by bit by articulating them in interviews and essays, hoping to win converts, and to open up minds.” Now I’m not that sure about the “winning converts” parts as it is hard to really assess the his works here but it is the ‘opening of minds’ that’s sorely needed to stem the tide of ECMI. Without better examinations into symbolic content and its workings, batik does not cross from craft into art and reflects only a simple, static, and hollow form of Malaysian / Malay–ness. It is clear that patronage from the late Datin Paduka Seri Endon is clearly the reason why batik has received so much coverage. I can imagine fashion designers whoring themselves to this fad. Oh well, batik installation at the balai anyone?
|
| posted by me again |
| "If Batik is such a powerful marker of Malaysianess or Malayness, perhaps wearing one will prevent us from being wrongly profiled by the police."
|
| posted by mani |
| Is there a batik arts museuem in Malaysia?
|
| posted by mat batik |
| Sratus tahun lagi pun batik malaysia tak boleh lawan dengan batik indonesia kalau setakat ini sahajalah pemikiran doktor USM ni. Boring!
|
| posted by kankongbelacan |
| pameran seni dan pameran batik. dua perkara pameran yang berlainan. pameran batik adalah pameran kraf. pameran seni adalah pameran yang melangkau sempadan visual. apa pentingnya pameran batik sebagai suatu pameran seni yang hendak dikaitkan dengan pameran visual. pameran batik adalah lebih kepada pameran kraf yang mengusulkan teknik mentjanting dan mewarna. tidak lebih daripada itu. imej batik adalah bunga, figura dan alam semulajadi. jadi sesiapa yang buat seni batik eloklah fikirkan buat design cadar tidur atau perusahhaan kraf batik. jangan buang masa kalau hendak cerita pasal tu dan ini, atau simbol itu atau ini. memang betul kita nak lawan dgn. batik jawa pun kita tak mampu. kita kata saja batik can make art as malaysian, ini adalah pembohong, sebabnya kita sendiripun jarang pakai batik. dan pameran batik amat sesuai untuk dikongsi dengan kraftangan atau pelancungan malaysia. dan tak layak sebagai suatu pameran yang berbentuk ilmiah sebagaimana yang digembur-gemburkan. kerana sampai hari ini peranan batik hanya setakat dibuat untuk pertunjukan fesyen. dan idea pameran batik ini pun idea lapuk....kalau buat pun seolah-olah hendak bodek sesuatu.....faham je le!!!!
|
| posted by bambangpembungkus |
| wahai dr. batik kalau Phd on studio, mana ada validnya. itu sebab bila tamat program course pun tutup. apa sumbanganya batik painting dalam kontek contemporary society, tak kan asyik nak cerita pasal symbol aje? tak nak ke buat rancangan baru mendigitalkan batik. kalau setakat asyik mentjanting dan mewarna, teknik tu dah lapuk, kalau begitu tak buat PHD pun tak apa. how batik's painting contribute new idea in malaysian culture.
|
| posted by biru-unggu
bbiru_unggu |
| pada saya......perkataan batik itu sendiri melambangkan harta pusaka nenek moyang kita...malah ia merupakan maruah anak bangsa melayu...kita menyanjung dan menyanyaginya sama juga seperti tanah melayu kita, bermakna...tidak dijajahi oleh kuasa asing atau orang luar...demi memartabatkan bangsa kita...begitu juga dengan batik..walaupun zaman dah berubah tapi seni dan teknik menghasilkan batik itu tidak akan berubah..mgkin hanya prubahan dr segi pemilihan tema warna dan pemilihan subjek untuk menghasilkan corak batik itu. Kalau semua nak 'up to date' x memetingkan nilai seni itu sendiri...maknanya.........sudah tiada nilai seni batik...yg ada hanyala...mentaliti yg terlalu memikirkan zaman multimedia....teknologi...mmg bagus..tapi tidak semua benda boleh dimodenkan...
|
| posted by Tjanting |
| Batik needs different 'method' or new 'panglipurlara'. For Dr. Zak congratulation. But, can we agree that it is about time to think differently on batik. For the sake of being different, batik needs different understanding if the present approach fails to make batik different as it should be. Your initial task 'to uncover possible meanings embedded in the set of imageries' seems quite simplistic and remains abstract. Thus, we remains puzzled by the function of batik and the value of batik in our contemporary time and space or at worst, when batik is functioned as a medium of aesthetic expression. What different does batik make for itself? For the sake of academic dignity, Dr. Zak's explanation would be much appreciated! Perhaps another session for Dr. Zak at Petronas Gallery for that matter?
|
| posted by observer |
| i think you should think something else that can make art move. please dont talk about same old story, i think you should write more novel than talking about art. your writing is suitable for novel rather than art. lets give young people a chance to express their idea.
|
Related Links
print | e-mail to a friend | post comment




