search web kakiseni
[ go ]

member login

register now | why register?
registration/login problems?

BOH Cameronian Arts Awards

"When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than any talent for abstract, positive thinking."

- Albert Einstein

Notice Board

Femes talent

Looking for a female vocalist/ guitarist

Design + printing service

Professional photo editing available

Indian &malay gals wanted to act along bollywood stars

Urgenttlyyy needed a bass player!!!!!!

Day, night & bridal make-up on www.surayanuar.com updated!

P ramlee the musical ticket

"sessionist services" / wanted urgently !""female pianist cum singer&female singer cum guitarist"

"personal music class "(klang&petaling jaya only)&"2 / 3 /4 piece acoustic band for live shows or events"

You are not logged in.
articles

 View on a single page

20. 03. 2008
Election Review: “ABU: Asal Bukan UMNO” by Zedeck Siew

In the days leading up to March 8th, 2008 (which, if you would allow me a tiny bit of propheteering, will enter popular parlance in the same way as November 10th — and, perhaps, May 13th) a new scrawl began appearing along Jalan Bangsar: on walls, rail supports, and the columns that hold up the beginnings to the New Pantai Expressway.

“ABU,” it said: “Asal bukan UMNO.” Later, I noticed an English translation had appeared to catch Anglophiles. “Anyone but UMNO.” In the week after elections, I heard that these same lines had been sprayed on in SS2 and elsewhere, often in interaction with a nearby Barisan Nasional ad.

Particulars of the graffiti varied. Most had no embellishments, delivering their sentiment plainly. Others sported more artistry: the one fixed to the Bangsar LRT station, for example, preferred its three letters in block stencil and filled in with black paint, to contrast against the blue background. Some, for maximum clarity as to “ABU” ’s acronymous nature, fixed a period after each alphabet.

abu2.jpg

 From the road

All caught the eye: partly because they were placed, by accident or design, on walls empty of visual clutter (gang tags, campaign posters, advertising stickers) — but mostly because their statement was so significant, in itself. The graffiti effectively shouted their line, like the ad hoc “Jemput Anwar” invitations we saw in 2005.

It was fun to speculate about the identities of those responsible for “ABU”. The visual differences meant that there was probably a number of individuals involved — if not a number of disparate groups, all swept up in memetic frenzy. Reckless guerrillas under the vigilance of campaign-alert police, they were probably nocturnal, young and male. Their modes of transportation would have been motorcycles, since these are nimblest. They were working-class, most likely; generally, the bourgeoisie do not have the fortitude to both respect graffiti and actually bring it about.

They were definitely not officially affiliated with the opposition’s Big Three; it’s hard to imagine PKR, DAP, or PAS candidates overtly associating themselves to such blatant illegality — and, of course, possible disqualification. Perhaps the flotillas of be-flagged bikes we saw streaming down highways last week carried spray cans with them. Woo-hoo!

abu.jpg

Passersby being arrested 

As for “ABU” ’s implications, I did not consider them very much — the bustle of election time was a larger distraction — though I do recall a sinking feeling in my stomach at the sight of the doodle. “Asal bukan UMNO” is a call to action: a plea, directive, and rallying cry in equal measure. (The paranoid among us would probably also call it a veiled threat.) But it is a message limited, in the end, by race politics. “Anyone but UMNO” pinpoints the United Malays National Organisation; not identifying the Barisan Nasional coalition means that “ABU” does not deign to speak for the Barisan Rakyat — a dusty adherence to allegiances of skin colour.

“Asal Bukan UMNO” is also a negative statement: “Don’t vote for them,” instead of “Vote for us.” Anything else but the ruling party would do, it seemed — and this demonstrates less for hope in the future than anger at the past. Last Saturday evening, as the numbers from salurans and polling stations flowed in, and news sites and SMSes gave the bilik gerakan good news, now-YB for the Bukit Lanjan state seat, Elizabeth Wong, sobered herself by saying: “This is a vote of no confidence to the BN government, more than it is a sign of support for us. We have to work hard.”

The elation in those hours is fast bleeding away, and as news of teething trouble — the altercations surrounding the choice of Perak’s Menteri Besar being the most recent — and pundit analysis builds I find myself waxing metaphorical about “abu”, instead. Taken as a word, instead of an acronym, it is surprisingly fitting: an old order passed away (a phrase retrospectively resonant and equally beguiling, what with Zakaria Md Deros’s shock expiration) in an overnight blaze that few — perhaps least of all the volunteers in opposition campaigns — saw coming; now Barisan Nasional’s Malaysia, that ugly piece of national architecture, is a smoldering ruin.

abu3.jpg

Oh, Khir!

Reconstruction is in order. Will the opposition parties manage to rise above (and, eventually, demolish) their race affiliations? Will they encourage moderates? Will we manage deal-brokering and diplomacy in such a way that the politics will not betray the aspiration for true democracy and a united people? The next few weeks — and, really, the next five years — will test our hopes, and our determination to see change for the better.

Close to midnight, at the beginning of March 9th, 2008, someone told me: “Now the real fight begins.” If the old Malaysia is in ashes, we will need to work for that phoenix — otherwise all we’ll get, in the end, is bitterness in our mouths.


~

Zedeck Siew writes and blogs for Kakiseni.

T
his article was first published in the Kakiseni Blog on March 14th, 2008. Check it out for daily insights and out-takes on money-making, national unity and more.

 View on a single page

User Comments

posted by Kathy, Tue 01.04.200810:46:04 AM
I doubt that political graffiti began in the late 90s, or with 18?. Proof of existence surely is not solely dependent our memory or knowledge of the form/presence. Stretching the notion of what is 'political' and what is 'graffiti', some may argue that the vandalism against road signs in Jawi script in the 1980s (?), were acts of political (or racists) graffiti. As for reactions, I'm guessing that the average Janes and Joes understood perfectly well the sentiment behind the graffiti. After all, they were written by other average Janes and Joes... On another note, kind of: I read somewhere Norman Mailer's take on graffiti, "Your presence on their Presence.." which is kind of perfect in many ways. It made me think of Fuad's works at the recent Rimbun Dahan residency show. I only saw a couple of images of the actual works so this is based on images of images, but they struck me as a kind of graffiti. Its an act of defacement but the site was no longer a physical space. It is nonetheless extremely powerful, even monolithic, as images of Merdeka have been appropriated into "their Presence" via it use in school text books and coffee table books on Malaysia to name two examples.

 

posted by Zedeck Siew, Tue 25.03.200811:05:40 AM
Hey L Chai:

If I'm not mistaken Danny's "18?" nets the first instances of politically-slanted graffiti in Kuala Lumpur -- late 2002, I believe, with the "Andre the Giant has a Posse"-esque, Big Brother-like faces of Mahathir around town.

As for joe-and-jane reactions, I don't know. What kind of average person will determine what they say; I suspect the fairly traditional "Oh, these vandals!" still reigns, in general. I spoke to the owner of Restoran Rocky, whom Danny interviewed in his doc. She thought they were as bad as -- but no worse than -- the sticker ads plastered across walls and tiangs in Bangsar.

And Amnesiac, I am referring to November 10th, 2007: the BERSIH Rally. But I guess you refute my clairvoyant abilities.

 

posted by Amnesiac, Mon 24.03.200821:24:03 PM
Er..r what happened on November 10th?

 

posted by "Ars Longa, Vita Brevis", Mon 24.03.200808:26:35 AM
If I'm not mistaken, graffiti has been used for political statements since ancient times (as far back as Ancient Greece and Rome)... Not surprising as they do make for a simple, cheap yet efffective tool.

 

posted by L. Chai, Fri 21.03.200805:50:22 AM
I am left with some questions, Zedeck. Am I right in thinking that political graffiti, of the effective kind anyway, started in the 90s with Anwar's sacking? (... barring Raising Fink's feminist scratches around KL in the years before that.)

Who does graffiti in KL speak to the most? I remember Danny Lim's doco "18" asked this question by quizzing people from all walks of life: the folks tending the shops nearby, artists, academics. I can't remember what the average Joe's opinion was, but amongst the political savvy set, it was most welcome.

 

Related Links

    print | e-mail to a friend | post comment